DT4 correspondence conjectures for Calabi–Yau fourfold invariants
DT4 correspondence conjectures for Calabi–Yau fourfold invariants
Let be a projective Calabi–Yau -fold. Write for the Hilbert scheme of points on , let be a line bundle, and distinguish Gromov–Witten, Donaldson–Thomas theory in dimension four (DT4), and Pandharipande–Thomas style invariants, including their reduced versions for holomorphic symplectic -folds. DT4 correspondence conjectures. The literature proposes relations between conventional invariants of and DT4 invariants, including: an explicit generating function for ; formulae for integrals of Segre classes, Verlinde classes, and Nekrasov genera over ; correspondences between genus Gromov–Witten invariants and -dimensional DT4 invariants; correspondences between genus Gromov–Witten invariants and Pandharipande–Thomas style DT4 invariants; correspondences between genus Gromov–Witten invariants and rank DT4 invariants; and, for holomorphic symplectic -folds, correspondences between reduced genus Gromov–Witten invariants and reduced DT4 invariants counting -dimensional sheaves, as well as reduced Pandharipande–Thomas style DT4 invariants. These proposals seek to relate conventional enumerative invariants, possibly after a change of variables in generating functions, to DT4 invariants. The source summarizes conjectures made in the cited literature rather than asserting a single new formula; their general status is not resolved here.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Dominic Joyce and Markus Upmeier, “Bordism categories and orientations of moduli spaces”, arXiv:2503.20456 (2025).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.