Nakanishi's 4-move conjecture for knots

At least 24 years old · documented by

A 4-move is the local operation on a link diagram that replaces four consecutive half-twists between two strands by the opposite four half-twists. Nakanishi's 4-move conjecture. Every knot can be reduced to the trivial knot by 4-moves. This conjecture is an early move-equivalence conjecture in knot theory, formulated by Nakanishi in 1979 before the 3-move conjecture was formally stated; the supplied evidence says it is disproved by the 22-cable of the figure-eight knot with a half-twist, a knot with 17 crossings.

References

Primary source

Rhea Palak Bakshi, Benjamin A. Burton, Huizheng Guo, Dionne Ibarra, Gabriel Montoya-Vega, Sujoy Mukherjee and Józef H. Przytycki, “The Montesinos-Nakanishi 3-move conjecture for links up to 20 crossings”, arXiv:2502.17711 (2025).

Additional references

5 papers in this index state this conjecture (2001–2025). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:math/0601004, arXiv:math/0312527, arXiv:math/0303012, arXiv:math/0109029.

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A 2025 paper reports a 1717-crossing counterexample, but that disproof has not been independently verified and the conjecture remains formally unsettled.

Nakanishi formulated the conjecture in 1979: every knot should be reducible to the trivial knot by 44-moves.

Known results

  • Verified for 22-bridge knots, closed 33-braid knots, and all knots with at most 1212 crossings (2012 and 2020).
  • Extensive computations found no counterexample among most alternating knots through 2020 crossings (2012).
  • The Burnside-group method gives no obstruction to the knot conjecture (2003).

February 2025 candidate counterexample; 2026 weaker theorem

A February 2025 paper reports that the 22-cable of the figure-eight knot with a half-twist, a 1717-crossing knot, is a guessed counterexample; this is an unverified claim rather than a proved disproof. A 2026 paper proves only that every knot is 44-move equivalent to one with trivial Alexander polynomial, and explicitly leaves Nakanishi’s conjecture open.

Current status (as of September 2026): The conjecture has a reported but unverified 1717-crossing counterexample; no verified disproof or proof is recorded, and the 2026 weaker theorem does not settle it.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.