Thin code conjecture for binary linear codes

Let CF2n\mathcal{C}\subseteq\mathbb{F}_2^n be a linear code. A hitting set for C\mathcal{C} is a set S[n]S\subseteq[n] such that cS0c_S\neq0 for every nonzero codeword cCc\in\mathcal{C}. Suppose that C\mathcal{C} has at least dd disjoint hitting sets S1,,SdS_1,\dots,S_d. Thin code conjecture. For any α<1\alpha<1, there exists an integer d=d(α)1d=d(\alpha)\geq1 such that there is a set S[n]S\subseteq[n] satisfying, for every nonzero cCc\in\mathcal{C},

αwt(c)wt(cS)<wt(c).\alpha\cdot\operatorname{wt}(c)\leq\operatorname{wt}(c_S)<\operatorname{wt}(c).

This conjecture generalizes the thin tree conjecture to binary linear codes by seeking a single set that captures an α\alpha-fraction, but not all, of the support of every nonzero codeword. The supplied text does not establish whether it is open or resolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shayan Oveis Gharan and Arvin Sahami, “Unweighted One-Sided Code Sparsifiers and Thin Subgraphs”, arXiv:2502.02799 (2025).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Partially solved

The conjecture remains unproved, but a 2025 paper established related sparsifier results and a later paper studied their computational difficulty.

The conjecture asks whether sufficiently many disjoint hitting sets force one set to capture a fixed fraction, but not all, of every nonzero codeword. It generalizes Goddyn’s thin tree conjecture, proposed about two decades earlier.

Known results

  • Every kk-dimensional code has at least 2nk2^{n-k} unweighted one-sided 1/21/2-sparsifiers.
  • One such sparsifier has size at most n/2+O(nk)n/2+O(\sqrt{nk}).
  • These results do not ensure wt(cS)<wt(c)\operatorname{wt}(c_S)<\operatorname{wt}(c) for every nonzero codeword, nor do they derive the conjecture from disjoint hitting sets.

February–October 2025 developments

The February manuscript states the thin code conjecture explicitly and leaves it open; it also notes that a stronger earlier formulation was refuted by Putterman for random linear codes. An October 2025 follow-up proves computational hardness for finding minimum-size one-sided 1/21/2-sparsifiers, but gives no proof or counterexample to the conjecture.

Current status (as of August 2026): The thin code conjecture remains open, with related existence and hardness results but no verified proof or counterexample recorded.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.