Condition keyconj under nonempty root intersection

Let ΦA\Phi_A and Ψλc+\Psi_{\lambda_{\mathbf c}}^+ be the sets defined by

ΦA={ϵi−ϵj∣i<j}∩Φ+∖ΦI,\Phi_A=\{\epsilon_i-\epsilon_j\mid i<j\}\cap\Phi^+\setminus\Phi_I,

and

Ψλc+={β∈Φ+∖ΦI∣⟨λc+ρ,β∨⟩∈Z>0}.\Psi_{\lambda_{\mathbf c}}^+=\{\beta\in\Phi^+\setminus\Phi_I\mid\langle\lambda_{\mathbf c}+\rho,\beta^\vee\rangle\in\mathbb Z_{>0}\}.

Suppose that ΦA∩Ψλc+≠∅\Phi_A\cap\Psi_{\lambda_{\mathbf c}}^+\neq\emptyset. The conjecture. Condition~ is satisfied, and consequently, Theorem~~(1)--(4) hold, if rr is odd or if rr is even and ωi≠0\omega_i\neq0 for some 0≤i≤k−10\leq i\leq k-1. The condition is presented as a conjectural converse-type case to the preceding sufficient criterion, which proves Condition~ when the intersection is empty. The supplied text does not establish this assertion or give evidence resolving its status.

References

Primary source

Hebing Rui and Linliang Song, “Decomposition numbers of the cyclotomic Brauer algebra over the complex field, II”, arXiv:2502.02081 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.