Condition keyconj under nonempty root intersection

Let ΦA\Phi_A and Ψλc+\Psi_{\lambda_{\mathbf c}}^+ be the sets defined by

ΦA={ϵiϵji<j}Φ+ΦI,\Phi_A=\{\epsilon_i-\epsilon_j\mid i<j\}\cap\Phi^+\setminus\Phi_I,

and

Ψλc+={βΦ+ΦIλc+ρ,βZ>0}.\Psi_{\lambda_{\mathbf c}}^+=\{\beta\in\Phi^+\setminus\Phi_I\mid\langle\lambda_{\mathbf c}+\rho,\beta^\vee\rangle\in\mathbb Z_{>0}\}.

Suppose that ΦAΨλc+\Phi_A\cap\Psi_{\lambda_{\mathbf c}}^+\neq\emptyset. The conjecture. Condition~ is satisfied, and consequently, Theorem~~(1)--(4) hold, if rr is odd or if rr is even and ωi0\omega_i\neq0 for some 0ik10\leq i\leq k-1. The condition is presented as a conjectural converse-type case to the preceding sufficient criterion, which proves Condition~ when the intersection is empty. The supplied text does not establish this assertion or give evidence resolving its status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hebing Rui and Linliang Song, “Decomposition numbers of the cyclotomic Brauer algebra over the complex field, II”, arXiv:2502.02081 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.