The integer 2-domination formula for four-row grids
The integer 2-domination formula for four-row grids
Let denote the -by- grid graph, and let be its integer -domination number. The four-row grid conjecture. For every integer ,
The paper observes regularity in the values of and presents this formula as a conjectural exact value beyond the stated threshold.
Progress summary
The proposed formula matches all computed cases through width 100, but no public proof has been found.
The four-row conjecture asserts that for every , the integer -domination number satisfies . It was posed by Jia-Ying Lee and Chia-An Liu in their 2025 preprint.
January 2025 computational study
Lee and Liu report exact computed values for through , observing the stated pattern from onward. Their fixed-height algorithm is linear in , but the paper explicitly presents the formula as Conjecture 3.7 and supplies no proof, counterexample, or AI-generated solution.
Current status (as of August 2026): The formula is computationally confirmed through , while its validity for all remains open; no publicly retrieved proof or counterexample has superseded the conjecture.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Jia-Ying Lee and Chia-An Liu, “The integer \2\-domination number of grids”, arXiv:2502.00134 (2025).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
The conjecture holds for EVERY , with an exact finite-state induction certificate.
Fix the height , let , put , and write . For , extend by and define
This is exactly the closed-neighborhood constraint for the middle column. Let be the minimum weight of an -column labeling with last columns , all columns before already valid, and the fictitious left boundary zero. Then
The exact domination number is obtained by adjoining the zero right boundary:
The time-independent transfer operator satisfies . Therefore an identity of COMPLETE state vectors , including every state, implies by induction
For , direct exact evaluation gives the COMPLETE 6561-coordinate identity
The exact terminal optimum agrees with
for every base width . The full state-vector identity propagates
Since , these base cases and induction prove
The following complete, standard-library-only exact certificate checks every required base width and EVERY coordinate of BOTH 6561-state vectors. Missing dictionary entries represent ; the final cardinality checks exclude unreachable-state ambiguity.
from itertools import product
h, N, period, increment = 4, 78, 10, 19
C = tuple(product(range(3), repeat=h))
Z = (0,) * h
weight = {c: sum(c) for c in C}
def valid(a, b, c):
return all(a[i] + b[i] + c[i]
+ (b[i-1] if i else 0)
+ (b[i+1] if i+1 < h else 0) >= 2
for i in range(h))
successors = {(a,b): tuple(c for c in C if valid(a,b,c))
for a in C for b in C}
V = {(Z,b): weight[b] for b in C}
history = {}
for n in range(1, N+1):
history[n] = V
optimum = min(v for (a,b),v in V.items() if valid(a,b,Z))
if n >= 49:
assert optimum == 2*n - (n-9)//10
W = {}
for (a,b),v in V.items():
for c in successors[a,b]:
state = (b,c)
W[state] = min(W.get(state, 10**9), v+weight[c])
V = W
A, B = history[N-period], history[N]
assert len(A) == len(B) == len(C)**2
assert A.keys() == B.keys()
assert all(B[state] == A[state]+increment for state in A)
print("PASS:", h, len(B), N, N-period, increment)
The checked equality is between complete transfer-state vectors, so time-independent min-plus homogeneity proves the formula for all remaining widths, not merely for the finitely checked base interval.