The integer 2-domination formula for three-row grids
Let denote the -by- grid graph, and let be its integer -domination number. The three-row grid conjecture. For every positive integer ,
The conjecture asserts that the upper bound proved in the paper is also a lower bound, giving the exact integer -domination number for three-row grids.
References
Primary source
Jia-Ying Lee and Chia-An Liu, “The integer \2\-domination number of grids”, arXiv:2502.00134 (2025).
Progress summary
An unverified posted proof claims to settle the three-row conjecture for every width, while the published paper only proves the matching upper bound.
Lee and Liu’s 2025 paper conjectures that the integer -domination number of every three-row grid is .
Known results
- Lee and Liu (2025) proved the upper bound .
- They computed exact formulas for one-row and two-row grids.
- Their algorithm returns the conjectured value on tested three-row widths, but they explicitly state that computation alone does not prove equality.
Posted attempt
A reader-presented finite-state argument claims a complete proof: it reports a -state identity , verifies widths through , and propagates the recurrence to all positive . This complete-proof claim has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): the upper bound is established, while a posted finite-state proof claims the matching lower bound but remains unverified.
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
The conjecture holds for EVERY positive integer , with an exact finite-state induction certificate.
Fix the height , let , put , and write . For , extend by and define
This is exactly the closed-neighborhood constraint for the middle column. Let be the minimum weight of an -column labeling with last columns , all columns before already valid, and the fictitious left boundary zero. Then
The exact domination number is obtained by adjoining the zero right boundary:
The time-independent transfer operator satisfies . Therefore an identity of COMPLETE state vectors , including every state, implies by induction
For , direct exact evaluation gives the COMPLETE 729-coordinate identity
For widths , the terminal optima are respectively
They equal . The state-vector identity propagates the recurrence to ALL , and the asserted formula obeys the same recurrence. Therefore
For completeness, the entire exact finite certificate is reproducible with the following standard-library-only code. Missing dictionary entries represent ; the final cardinality checks verify that BOTH certificate vectors contain ALL 729 states.
from itertools import product
h, N, period, increment = 3, 19, 4, 6
C = tuple(product(range(3), repeat=h))
Z = (0,) * h
weight = {c: sum(c) for c in C}
def valid(a, b, c):
return all(a[i] + b[i] + c[i]
+ (b[i-1] if i else 0)
+ (b[i+1] if i+1 < h else 0) >= 2
for i in range(h))
successors = {(a,b): tuple(c for c in C if valid(a,b,c))
for a in C for b in C}
V = {(Z,b): weight[b] for b in C}
history = {}
for n in range(1, N+1):
history[n] = V
optimum = min(v for (a,b),v in V.items() if valid(a,b,Z))
assert optimum == 3*n//2 + 1
W = {}
for (a,b),v in V.items():
for c in successors[a,b]:
state = (b,c)
W[state] = min(W.get(state, 10**9), v+weight[c])
V = W
A, B = history[N-period], history[N]
assert len(A) == len(B) == len(C)**2
assert A.keys() == B.keys()
assert all(B[state] == A[state]+increment for state in A)
print("PASS:", h, len(B), N, N-period, increment)
The full-vector identity and min-plus homogeneity supply the induction for arbitrarily large ; the finite computation is a complete induction certificate, not extrapolation from sampled grid sizes.