The canonical bundle formula conjecture

About 1 year old · traced to

Suppose (X,B)/Z(X,B)/Z is a contraction with relative dimension >0>0, where (X,B)(X,B) is a generically lc projective pair and KX+B∼Q0/ZK_X+B\sim_\mathbb Q 0/Z. Let η=Spec⁡(k(Z))\eta=\operatorname{Spec}(k(Z)) be the generic point of ZZ. For each prime divisor DD on ZZ, define the discriminant coefficient using the log canonical threshold lct⁡η(X,B,f∗D)\operatorname{lct}_\eta(X,B,f^*D).

Canonical bundle formula conjecture. There is

BZ:=∑D prime divisor on Z(1−lct⁡η(X,B,f∗D))DB_Z:=\sum_{D\text{ prime divisor on }Z}(1-\operatorname{lct}_\eta(X,B,f^*D))D

\nand some pseudo-effective Q\mathbb Q-b-divisor MZM_Z such that

KX+BX∼Qf∗(KZ+BZ+MZ).K_X+B_X\sim_\mathbb Q f^*(K_Z+B_Z+M_Z).

Moreover, if (X,B)(X,B) is lc, then MXM_X is a b-nef Q\mathbb Q-b-divisor, where

MX=KX+BX−f∗(KZ+BZ)∼Qf∗MZ.M_X=K_X+B_X-f^*(K_Z+B_Z)\sim_\mathbb Q f^*M_Z.

The formula decomposes the relative canonical class into discriminant and moduli contributions and is a central tool in the birational geometry of fiber spaces. In characteristic 00, the conjecture was completely settled by a series of works; the positive-characteristic situation is part of the motivation for this paper.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. The canonical bundle formula conjecture

    Suppose f ⁣:(X,B)→Zf\colon (X,B)\to Z is a contraction, where (X,B)(X,B) is a generically lc projective pair and KX+B∼Q0/ZK_X+B\sim_{\mathbb Q}0/Z. For the generic point η=Spec⁡(k(D))\eta=\operatorname{Spec}(k(D)) of a prime divisor DD on ZZ, define the discriminant divisor

    BZ:=∑D prime divisor on Z(1−lct⁡η(X,B,f∗D))D.B_Z:=\sum_{D\text{ prime divisor on }Z}(1-\operatorname{lct}_\eta(X,B,f^*D))D.

    There is also a pseudo-effective Q\mathbb Q-b-divisor MZM_Z such that

    KX+BX∼Qf∗(KZ+BZ+MZ).K_X+B_X\sim_{\mathbb Q}f^*(K_Z+B_Z+M_Z).

    Moreover, if (X,B)(X,B) is lc, then MXM_X is a b-nef Q\mathbb Q-b-divisor, where MX=KX+BX−f∗(KZ+BZ)∼Qf∗MZM_X=K_X+B_X-f^*(K_Z+B_Z)\sim_{\mathbb Q}f^*M_Z.

    Canonical bundle formula conjecture. The stated discriminant and moduli decomposition, together with the b-nefness assertion for the moduli b-divisor in the lc case, holds.

    The canonical bundle formula is a central form of fiber-space adjunction. It was completely resolved in characteristic zero, whereas the source states that it fails in general in positive characteristic.

    source: Xintong Jiang, “Boundedness of complements for fibered Fano threefolds in positive characteristic”, arXiv:2506.00553 (2025).

References

Primary source

Xintong Jiang, “On the canonical bundle formula and effective birationality for Fano varieties in char p>0”, arXiv:2501.12041 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.