The derivation construction conjecture for transposed Poisson n-Lie algebras

About 1 year old · traced to

Let n≥2n\geq 2 be an integer. Let (L,⋅,[⋅,…,⋅])(L,\cdot,[\cdot,\ldots,\cdot]) be a transposed Poisson nn-Lie algebra, and let DD be a derivation of both (L,⋅)(L,\cdot) and (L,[⋅,…,⋅])(L,[\cdot,\ldots,\cdot]). Define an (n+1)(n+1)-ary operation

μ(a1,…,an+1)=∑i=1n+1(−1)i−1D(ai)[a1,…,a^i,…,an+1],\mu(a_1,\ldots,a_{n+1})=\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}(-1)^{i-1}D(a_i)[a_1,\ldots,\hat{a}_i,\ldots,a_{n+1}],

where a^i\hat{a}_i denotes omission of the ii-th entry. Derivation construction conjecture. Then (L,⋅,μ(⋅,…,⋅))(L,\cdot,\mu(\cdot,\ldots,\cdot)) is a transposed Poisson (n+1)(n+1)-Lie algebra. This conjecture extends the known construction for transposed Poisson 2-Lie algebras and addresses the open question of constructing and classifying simple transposed Poisson nn-Lie algebras. Its validity for arbitrary n≥2n\geq 2 and the stated derivations remains open.

References

Primary source

Farukh Mashurov, “On the transposed Poisson n-Lie algebras”, arXiv:2501.01714 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.