The support approximation conjecture for vexillary involutions

From papers

Let IvexI^{\mathsf{vex}}_\infty be the set of vexillary involutions, and let Binv(z)\mathcal{B}_{\mathsf{inv}}(z), Binv+(z)\mathcal{B}_{\mathsf{inv}}^+(z), and supp(GCzO)\operatorname{supp}(\operatorname{GC}^{\mathsf{O}}_z) denote the sets defined in the paper. Support approximation conjecture. If zIvexz \in I^{\mathsf{vex}}_\infty, then

Binv(z)supp(GCzO)Binv+(z).\mathcal{B}_{\mathsf{inv}}(z)\subseteq \operatorname{supp}(\operatorname{GC}^{\mathsf{O}}_z) \subseteq \mathcal{B}_{\mathsf{inv}}^+(z).

The conjecture is motivated by computational verification for all vexillary zI11z\in I_{11} and extends the preceding containment results; the general statement remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Eric Marberg and Jiayi Wen, “On some Grothendieck expansions”, arXiv:2412.18963 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.