The monoidal–additive correspondence conjecture

About 2 years old · traced to

Let A\mathcal{A} be a cluster algebra with monoidal categorification Cℓ\mathscr{C}_\ell and additive categorification (F,T^)(\mathcal{F},\widehat{T}), let C\mathcal{C} be the stable category of F\mathcal{F}, and let M∈Pℓ+M\in\mathcal{P}_\ell^+ be dominant. Write L(M)L(M) for the associated simple module, gM∈Zn\mathbf{g}_M\in\mathbb{Z}^n for the g\mathbf{g}-vector of χq(L(M))\chi_q(L(M)), and e(gM)\mathfrak{e}(\mathbf{g}_M) for the generic degenerate EE-invariant. Monoidal–additive correspondence conjecture.

L(M) is real⟺e(gM)=0.L(M)\text{ is real}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\mathfrak{e}(\mathbf{g}_M)=0.

The source notes that the forward implication follows for reachable monomials, while the full equivalence is used to relate monoidal and additive reachability and remains conjectural.

References

Primary source

Karin Baur, Changjian Fu and Jian-rong Li, “A correspondence between additive and monoidal categorifications with application to Grassmannian cluster categories”, arXiv:2410.04401 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.