The non--gonal pyramidal number formula for
Let , and let the -th non--gonal pyramidal number be the -th positive integer that is not a -gonal pyramidal number. The preceding formula defines this sequence in terms of the integer cube root of . Non--gonal pyramidal number formula. For , the -th non--gonal pyramidal number is given by the formula in Eq.. The claim extends the stated formula beyond the range established earlier in the paper; the supplied text gives no proof or resolution for .
References
Primary source
Chai Wah Wu, “Algorithms for complementary sequences”, arXiv:2409.05844 (2025).
Progress summary
The conjecture remains unconfirmed, but a reader has posted a purported complete proof extending the formula to every dimension-like parameter at least three.
Wu’s 2024 paper conjectures that the stated formula for the numbers omitted from the -gonal pyramidal sequence holds for every ; it does not prove this extension.
Known results
- Theorem 9 proves the formula for (Wu, 2024).
- For broader fixed , the paper establishes the relevant formula only for all sufficiently large , with a threshold .
Posted attempt
A reader claims a complete proof, using the offset characterization of complementary sequences, and asserts that the formula holds for every , hence also for . The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The formula is proved for and eventually valid for each fixed , while the all- claim for has only an unverified posted proof attempt.
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Proof, valid for every
Let
be the -th -gonal-pyramidal number, and let be the -th positive integer not among these numbers. Set
I will prove the following three-branch formula from Equation (5):
- if
- if
- otherwise.
Write , and put , with the auxiliary values . Then
Its first difference is
so the pyramidal numbers are strictly increasing.
Suppose . Exactly pyramidal numbers precede this value, so
Because all quantities are integers, this is equivalent to
Conversely, (1) says that exactly pyramidal and complementary values occur through . Thus (1) uniquely characterizes the required offset .
The definition of gives
For , direct expansion gives
For , similarly,
Together with (2), these inequalities show that
Consequently, the offset can only be , , or .
It remains to identify which one occurs. The lower expression in the stated formula satisfies
Therefore its condition is exactly , which, by (1), selects .
The upper expression satisfies
Its condition is therefore , which selects .
If neither condition holds, then
so (1) selects .
Finally, when , the upper threshold is , so its condition holds automatically because ; it correctly gives .
Substituting and yields exactly the three branches above. Hence Conjecture 1 holds, and its range strengthens from to every .
Source: Chai Wah Wu, “Algorithms for complementary sequences,” Equation (5) and Conjecture 1: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05844