The Keel–Yu mirror detropicalization conjecture

About 2 years old · traced to

Let UU be an affine log-Calabi–Yau variety containing an open torus. Let sk(U)\mathrm{sk}(U) denote its Kontsevich–Soibelman tropical skeleton, and let M\mathcal{M} and N\mathcal{N} be polyptych lattices. A detropicalization of a polyptych lattice M\mathcal{M} is a pair (AM,v:AM→SM)(\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{M}},\mathfrak{v}:\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{M}}\to\mathcal{S}_{\mathcal{M}}) as in the paper; a strict dual pair is a pair of polyptych lattices satisfying the paper's strict-duality condition, and a chart-Gorenstein-Fano PL polytope is a PL polytope with the stated chart-Gorenstein-Fano property.

Keel–Yu mirror detropicalization conjecture. (1) In the presence of multiple open tori, the integral points of sk(U)\mathrm{sk}(U) can be equipped with the structure of a polyptych lattice M\mathcal{M}. Moreover, the Keel–Yu mirror algebra can be realized as a detropicalization of M\mathcal{M}. (2) In particular, if M\mathcal{M} and N\mathcal{N} are a strict dual pair of polyptych lattices, and N\mathcal{N} admits a detropicalization and a chart-Gorenstein-Fano PL polytope P\mathcal{P}, then the coordinate ring of the Keel–Yu mirror to Spec⁡(AN)\operatorname{Spec}(\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{N}}) is a detropicalization of M\mathcal{M}.

This is presented as a suspected statement connecting the paper's polyptych-lattice detropicalizations with log-Calabi–Yau mirror constructions of Keel and Yu. The precise hypotheses under which the skeleton acquires the required polyptych structure and the mirror algebra realizes the detropicalization remain open.

References

Primary source

Laura Escobar, Megumi Harada and Christopher Manon, “Geometric families of degenerations from mutations of polytopes”, arXiv:2408.01785 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.