The strong bi-anabelian m-step solvable Grothendieck conjecture

Let kk be a field with absolute Galois group GkG_k, let U1,U2U_1,U_2 be the curves under consideration, and let m,nm,n be non-negative integers. For each rr, write π1eˊt(Ui,)(r)\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_1(U_i,\ast)^{(r)} for the corresponding geometrically maximal rr-step solvable quotient. The groups of kk-isomorphisms and GkG_k-equivariant isomorphisms are denoted by Isomk\mathrm{Isom}_k and IsomGk\mathrm{Isom}_{G_k}, respectively, and Inn\mathrm{Inn} denotes inner automorphisms. The strong bi-anabelian form of the mm-step solvable Grothendieck conjecture. Fix a non-negative integer nn. The image of

Isomk(U1,U2)IsomGk(π1eˊt(U1,)(m),π1eˊt(U2,)(m))/Inn(π1eˊt(U2,ksep,)m)\mathrm{Isom}_{k}(U_{1},U_{2})\to \mathrm{Isom}_{G_{k}}(\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_{1}(U_{1},\ast)^{(m)},\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_{1}(U_{2},\ast)^{(m)})/\mathrm{Inn}(\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_{1}(U_{2,k^{\mathrm{sep}}},\ast)^{m})

coincides with the image of

IsomGk(π1eˊt(U1,)(m+n),π1eˊt(U2,)(m+n))/Inn(π1eˊt(U2,ksep,)m+n).\mathrm{Isom}_{G_{k}}(\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_{1}(U_{1},\ast)^{(m+n)},\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_{1}(U_{2},\ast)^{(m+n)})/\mathrm{Inn}(\pi^{\acute{e}\mathrm{t}}_{1}(U_{2,k^{\mathrm{sep}}},\ast)^{m+n}).

The strong form refines the weak form by incorporating functoriality. The source discusses previous results and the role of coverings, but does not resolve the conjecture in this general formulation.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Naganori Yamaguchi, “The metabelian Grothendieck conjecture for genus zero curves over finitely generated fields”, arXiv:2407.09906 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.