Qin's quasi-modularity conjecture for Hilbert schemes of points
Qin's quasi-modularity conjecture for Hilbert schemes of points
Let be a smooth projective complex surface, and let be the Hilbert scheme of points on . For line bundles on , let denote the -th Chern character of the tautological bundle, and define the reduced generating series
where . Qin's conjecture. If the canonical divisor of is numerically trivial, then is a quasi-modular form of weight at most
This conjecture predicts strong modularity properties for intersection-theoretic generating series on Hilbert schemes of points. The paper verifies it for the case , while the general statement remains open.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Mazen M Alhwaimel, “Toward Qin's Conjecture on Hilbert schemes of points and quasi-modular forms”, arXiv:2407.01554 (2024).
Additional references
2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2023–2024). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2310.10812.
Progress summary
A 2024 paper verifies one two-factor case of Qin’s conjecture, while the general statement remains open and no later complete proof or counterexample was found.
Qin’s conjecture predicts that certain intersection generating series for Hilbert schemes of points are quasi-modular when the surface has numerically trivial canonical class, with an explicit weight bound. The full assertion is not yet proved.
Known results
- Qin and Yu (2018): verified the conjecture modulo lower-weight terms.
- Carlsson (2012): proved quasi-modularity for the corresponding series on .
- Okounkov (2014): conjectured that the reduced series are multiple -zeta values.
2024–2025 partial developments
The 2024 paper proves the conjecture for , giving the predicted weight bound . A May 2025 paper proves a related single equivariant series and obtains further restricted partial results, but does not establish Qin’s general statement.
Current status (as of August 2026): The case and several related special cases are settled, but Qin’s conjecture for arbitrary and remains open.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.