Higher spin Serre relations

About 2 years old · traced to

Let AmnA_m^n be a unital C(q){\mathbb C}(q)-algebra, and let {Xr(i)}1≤r≤m−1, 0≤i≤n⊂Amn\{\mathsf X_r^{(i)}\}_{1\leq r\leq m-1,\,0\leq i\leq n}\subset A_m^n satisfy Xr(0)=1\mathsf X_r^{(0)}=1 together with the relations defining the elements Xr(i)\mathsf X_r^{(i)} and the spin Serre relations. Higher spin Serre conjecture. For 1≤a,b,c≤n1\leq a,b,c\leq n, there are ξ∈C(q)\xi\in{\mathbb C}(q) and 1≤a′,b′,c′≤n1\leq a',b',c'\leq n such that

Xi(a)Xi±1(b)Xi(c)=ξ Xi±1(a′)Xi(b′)Xi±1(c′)+LOTa,b,c,\mathsf X_i^{(a)}\mathsf X_{i\pm1}^{(b)}\mathsf X_i^{(c)}=\xi\,\mathsf X_{i\pm1}^{(a')}\mathsf X_i^{(b')}\mathsf X_{i\pm1}^{(c')}+\mathrm{LOT}_{a,b,c},

where LOTa,b,c\mathrm{LOT}_{a,b,c} is a linear combination of terms Xi(k)Xi±1(ℓ)\mathsf X_i^{(k)}\mathsf X_{i\pm1}^{(\ell)} and Xi±1(ℓ)Xi(k)\mathsf X_{i\pm1}^{(\ell)}\mathsf X_i^{(k)}. This is intended to provide more-general versions of the stated spin Serre proposition and is used in the proposed characterization of spin link polynomials.

References

Primary source

Elijah Bodish, Ben Elias and David E. V. Rose, “Spin Link Homology”, arXiv:2407.00189 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.