Parabolic-induction compatibility for semisimple local Langlands

Let bbMbbM be a Levi subgroup of bbGbbG, let bbP=bbM\ltimesbbNbbP=bbM\ltimesbbN be a parabolic subgroup, let bbrho\inbbPibbC(bbM)bbrho\inbbPi_{bbC}(bbM), and let bbpibbpi be an irreducible subquotient of ibbPbbG(bbrho)i_{bbP}^{bbG}(bbrho). Parabolic-induction compatibility conjecture. The semisimple parameters bbiotabbM,bbG(bbmathcalLLbbM(bbrho))ssbbiota_{bbM,bbG}\circ(bbmathcal{LL}_{bbM}(bbrho))_{ss} and (bbmathcalLLbbG(bbpi))ss(bbmathcal{LL}_{bbG}(bbpi))_{ss} are bbhatbbG(bbC)bbhat{bbG}(bbC)-conjugate.

This is presented as the expected compatibility of local Langlands with parabolic induction; the source attributes it to Haines's Conjecture 5.22. The supplied text gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jean-François Dat, David Helm, Robert Kurinczuk and Gilbert Moss, “Local Langlands in families: The banal case”, arXiv:2406.09283 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.