Log Abundance conjecture for klt pairs

About 2 years old · traced to

Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a projective klt pair of dimension nn. Let Nef⁡(X)\operatorname{Nef}(X) be the nef cone, let Sem⁡(X)\operatorname{Sem}(X) be the cone of semiample divisors, and let Mov⁡n−1(X)=Sem⁡(X)\operatorname{Mov}^{n-1}(X)=\operatorname{Sem}(X) and Mov⁡‾n−1(X)=Nef⁡(X)\overline{\operatorname{Mov}}^{n-1}(X)=\operatorname{Nef}(X). Log Abundance conjecture. If

KX+Δ∈Nef⁡(X)=Mov⁡‾n−1(X),K_X+\Delta\in\operatorname{Nef}(X)=\overline{\operatorname{Mov}}^{n-1}(X),

then

KX+Δ∈Sem⁡(X)=Mov⁡n−1(X).K_X+\Delta\in\operatorname{Sem}(X)=\operatorname{Mov}^{n-1}(X).

This is known for varieties of dimension at most 33 and when KX+ΔK_X+\Delta is big, but remains widely open in general.

References

Primary source

Gilberto Bini, Maria Chiara Brambilla, Claudio Fontanari and Elisa Postinghel, “Nonvanishing and Abundance for cones of movable divisors”, arXiv:2405.14553 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.