Magneticity is preserved by Atkin–Lehner involutions

Let Γ1(N)\Gamma_1(N) be the congruence subgroup and let Mk(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}_k(\Gamma_1(N)) be the space of modular forms of weight kk. Let Mk,dmag(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{mag}}_{k,d}(\Gamma_1(N)) be its magnetic subspace of depth dd. For an exact divisor QQ of NN, the Atkin–Lehner involution WQW_Q acts on Mk(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}_k(\Gamma_1(N)).

Atkin–Lehner invariance conjecture. The action of Atkin–Lehner involutions on Mk(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}_k(\Gamma_1(N)) restricts to the magnetic subspaces

Mk,dmag(Γ1(N)).\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{mag}}_{k,d}(\Gamma_1(N)).

The conjecture is motivated by computations of Atkin–Lehner actions on several examples of magnetic modular forms. It predicts preservation of magneticity under these involutions.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Kilian Bönisch, Claude Duhr and Sara Maggio, “Some conjectures around magnetic modular forms”, arXiv:2404.04085 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.