Magneticity is preserved by Atkin–Lehner involutions

About 2 years old · traced to

Let Γ1(N)\Gamma_1(N) be the congruence subgroup and let Mk(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}_k(\Gamma_1(N)) be the space of modular forms of weight kk. Let Mk,dmag(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{mag}}_{k,d}(\Gamma_1(N)) be its magnetic subspace of depth dd. For an exact divisor QQ of NN, the Atkin–Lehner involution WQW_Q acts on Mk(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}_k(\Gamma_1(N)).

Atkin–Lehner invariance conjecture. The action of Atkin–Lehner involutions on Mk(Γ1(N))\mathcal{M}_k(\Gamma_1(N)) restricts to the magnetic subspaces

Mk,dmag(Γ1(N)).\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{mag}}_{k,d}(\Gamma_1(N)).

The conjecture is motivated by computations of Atkin–Lehner actions on several examples of magnetic modular forms. It predicts preservation of magneticity under these involutions.

References

Primary source

Kilian Bönisch, Claude Duhr and Sara Maggio, “Some conjectures around magnetic modular forms”, arXiv:2404.04085 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.