Conjecture on simultaneous analytic images of Liouville matrices

About 2 years old · traced to

Let n≥2n\ge 2 and let I⊆RI\subseteq\mathbb{R} be an open interval containing 00. Let Ln,n\mathscr{L}_{n,n} denote the set of Liouville matrices, and let \textswabfk\textswab{f}_k and \textswabgk\textswab{g}_k be the extensions associated with sequences of analytic functions fk,gk:I→Rf_k,g_k:I\to\mathbb{R}, respectively. For a,b,c,d∈Ra,b,c,d\in\mathbb{R}, let τa,b,c,d\tau_{a,b,c,d} denote the function referred to in the source as equation (4). Assume that, for every k≥1k\ge 1, gkg_k is not of the form τa,b,c,d\tau_{a,b,c,d}, and that no fk1f_{k_1} is identical on II to τa,b,c,d∘gk2\tau_{a,b,c,d}\circ g_{k_2} for any a,b,c,d∈Ra,b,c,d\in\mathbb{R} and k1,k2∈Nk_1,k_2\in\mathbb{N}. Conjecture on simultaneous analytic images of Liouville matrices. There exists A∈Ln,nA\in\mathscr{L}_{n,n} such that

\textswabfk(A)∈Ln,nand\textswabgk(A)∉Ln,n\textswab{f}_k(A)\in\mathscr{L}_{n,n}\quad\text{and}\quad \textswab{g}_k(A)\notin\mathscr{L}_{n,n}

for every k≥1k\ge 1. Equivalently,

⋂k≥1(\textswabfk−1(Ln,n)∩\textswabgk−1(Ln,nc))∩Ln,n≠∅.\bigcap_{k\ge 1}\left(\textswab{f}_k^{-1}(\mathscr{L}_{n,n})\cap\textswab{g}_k^{-1}(\mathscr{L}_{n,n}^{c})\right)\cap\mathscr{L}_{n,n}\ne\emptyset.

This conjecture combines the preceding results on analytic images of Liouville matrices and would provide a simultaneous positive/negative image theorem under the stated exclusions. The supplied context does not indicate whether it has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Johannes Schleischitz, “Maillet's property and Mahler's Conjecture on Liouville numbers fail for matrices”, arXiv:2403.14434 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.