Wavefront-set upper-bound conjecture for Langlands parameters

Let Gω(k){\mathbf G}^\omega({\mathsf k}) be a reductive pp-adic group, let π(λ,s,O,L)\pi(\lambda,s,{{\mathcal O}}^\vee,{{\mathcal L}}^\vee) be an irreducible representation in the LL-packet Π(φ)=Π(λ,s,O)\Pi(\varphi)=\Pi(\lambda,s,{{\mathcal O}}^\vee), and let kˉWF(π){}^{\bar {\mathsf k}}\mathsf{WF}(\pi) denote its geometric wavefront set. For sets of nilpotent orbits, write S1S2\mathcal S_1\leq\mathcal S_2 when every orbit in S1\mathcal S_1 is contained in the closure of some orbit in S2\mathcal S_2. Let dd and dd^\vee be the relevant duality maps, and let GOG^\vee\cdot{{\mathcal O}}^\vee denote the GG^\vee-saturation of the dual nilpotent orbit. Wavefront-set upper-bound conjecture. For every such π\pi,

kˉWF(AZ(π))d(GO).{}^{\bar {\mathsf k}}\mathsf{WF}({\mathsf{AZ}}(\pi))\leq d^\vee(G^\vee\cdot{{\mathcal O}}^\vee).

Equivalently,

Od(kˉWF(AZ(π))).{{\mathcal O}}^\vee\subset\overline{d({}^{\bar {\mathsf k}}\mathsf{WF}({\mathsf{AZ}}(\pi)))}.

The conjecture relates geometric wavefront sets of Aubert–Zelevinsky duals to nilpotent orbits in Langlands parameters. It generalizes known results for several classes of unipotent and supercuspidal representations, but the general assertion remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Dan Ciubotaru and Ju-Lee Kim, “The wavefront set: bounds for the Langlands parameter”, arXiv:2403.14261 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.