Irrationality conjecture for the roots associated with an infinite family of horospherical cones

At least 1 year old · documented by

For each integer r≥5r\geq 5, define

Q(t,r)=∫−42+t2r−61+tp(4+(2+t)p)2(4r−8−tp)2(2r−6−(1+t)p)2r−7(2r−2+p)2r−7 dp.Q(t,r)=\int_{\frac{-4}{2+t}}^{\frac{2r-6}{1+t}}p(4+(2+t)p)^2(4r-8-tp)^2(2r-6-(1+t)p)^{2r-7}(2r-2+p)^{2r-7}\,dp.

The equation Q(t,r)=0Q(t,r)=0 has a unique positive root. Irrationality conjecture. For all r≥5r\geq 5, this unique positive root is irrational. This is presented as an algebro-arithmetic reformulation of the regularity conjecture for the family SL⁡r/S⁡(GL⁡2×GL⁡r−2)\operatorname{SL}_{r}/\operatorname{S}(\operatorname{GL}_2\times\operatorname{GL}_{r-2}); the source attributes the polynomial characterization of the K-stability condition to previous work, while the irrationality remains conjectural.

References

Primary source

Tran-Trung Nghiem, “Calabi-Yau metrics on rank two symmetric spaces with horospherical tangent cone at infinity”, arXiv:2401.05122 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.