Functoriality of the rigid refined local Langlands correspondence

At least 2 years old · documented by

Let G1→ηG2G_1\xrightarrow{\eta}G_2 be a morphism of quasi-split connected reductive groups with central kernel and abelian cokernel, let (T,hˉ)(\mathcal T,\bar h) be a ZZ-rigid inner twist for G1G_1 inducing (T′,hˉ′)(\mathcal T',\bar h') for G2G_2, and let w\mathfrak w be the induced Whittaker datum. Assume that both groups have connected centers. For a tempered parameter φ\varphi for G2G_2, let ρ∈Irr⁡(π0(Sφ+),T′)\rho\in\operatorname{Irr}(\pi_0(S_\varphi^+),\mathcal T') and suppose that ιw,G2−1(φ,ρ)∘η′\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_2}^{-1}(\varphi,\rho)\circ\eta' is irreducible.

Functoriality conjecture. The representation

((T,hˉ),ιw,G2−1(φ,ρ)∘η′)((\mathcal T,\bar h),\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_2}^{-1}(\varphi,\rho)\circ\eta')

lies in the compound LL-packet ΠLη∘φZ′\Pi^{Z'}_{{}^{L}\eta\circ\varphi}. Moreover, if

π0(Sφ+)→Lηπ0(SLη∘φ+)\pi_0(S_\varphi^+)\xrightarrow{{}^{L}\eta}\pi_0(S_{{}^{L}\eta\circ\varphi}^+)

is bijective, then

((T,hˉ),ιw,G2−1(φ,ρ)∘η′)=ιw,G1−1(Lη∘φ,ρ∘Lη).((\mathcal T,\bar h),\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_2}^{-1}(\varphi,\rho)\circ\eta')=\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_1}^{-1}({}^{L}\eta\circ\varphi,\rho\circ{}^{L}\eta).

This is a functoriality requirement for the rigid refined local Langlands correspondence under morphisms with central kernel and abelian cokernel. The paper notes that it is weaker than a cited broader functoriality conjecture, which is known in many cases, but retains the assumptions needed for the construction.

References

Primary source

Peter Dillery, “Isocrystals and limits of rigid local Langlands correspondences”, arXiv:2312.09195 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.