Functoriality of the rigid refined local Langlands correspondence

Let G1ηG2G_1\xrightarrow{\eta}G_2 be a morphism of quasi-split connected reductive groups with central kernel and abelian cokernel, let (T,hˉ)(\mathcal T,\bar h) be a ZZ-rigid inner twist for G1G_1 inducing (T,hˉ)(\mathcal T',\bar h') for G2G_2, and let w\mathfrak w be the induced Whittaker datum. Assume that both groups have connected centers. For a tempered parameter φ\varphi for G2G_2, let ρIrr(π0(Sφ+),T)\rho\in\operatorname{Irr}(\pi_0(S_\varphi^+),\mathcal T') and suppose that ιw,G21(φ,ρ)η\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_2}^{-1}(\varphi,\rho)\circ\eta' is irreducible.

Functoriality conjecture. The representation

((T,hˉ),ιw,G21(φ,ρ)η)((\mathcal T,\bar h),\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_2}^{-1}(\varphi,\rho)\circ\eta')

lies in the compound LL-packet ΠLηφZ\Pi^{Z'}_{{}^{L}\eta\circ\varphi}. Moreover, if

π0(Sφ+)Lηπ0(SLηφ+)\pi_0(S_\varphi^+)\xrightarrow{{}^{L}\eta}\pi_0(S_{{}^{L}\eta\circ\varphi}^+)

is bijective, then

((T,hˉ),ιw,G21(φ,ρ)η)=ιw,G11(Lηφ,ρLη).((\mathcal T,\bar h),\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_2}^{-1}(\varphi,\rho)\circ\eta')=\iota_{\mathfrak w,G_1}^{-1}({}^{L}\eta\circ\varphi,\rho\circ{}^{L}\eta).

This is a functoriality requirement for the rigid refined local Langlands correspondence under morphisms with central kernel and abelian cokernel. The paper notes that it is weaker than a cited broader functoriality conjecture, which is known in many cases, but retains the assumptions needed for the construction.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Peter Dillery, “Isocrystals and limits of rigid local Langlands correspondences”, arXiv:2312.09195 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.