Edge-coloring conjecture for two cliques joined by an edge

Let S=((KnKn)+e,csigma)S=((K_n\mathbin{\cup}K_n)+e,csigma) be a signed graph formed from two identical copies of KnK_n joined by a single edge ee, with χ(S)\chi'(S) denoting its signed edge-chromatic number and Δ(S)\Delta(S) its maximum degree.

Two-cliques edge-coloring conjecture. The signed edge-chromatic number satisfies

χ(S)=Δ(S)=n.\chi'(S)=\Delta(S)=n.

This is the second edge-coloring problem left open in the stated discussion of corona products with first factor of maximum degree at most one. The supplied parser marks its resolution as unknown, so it is recorded as open.

References

Primary source

Robert Janczewski, Krzysztof Turowski and Bartłomiej Wróblewski, “Edge coloring of products of signed graphs”, arXiv:2312.02691 (2024).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A reader-submitted proof claims to settle the conjecture for every signing, but nobody has independently checked it.

The conjecture, recorded as Conjecture 26 in the 2023 paper Edge coloring of products of signed graphs, asserts that two copies of KnK_n joined by one edge satisfy χ(S)=Δ(S)=n\chi'(S)=\Delta(S)=n for every signing.

Known results

  • The 2023 paper states that the arbitrary-signature problem is open.
  • It proves the claim when the edge signs on the two copies are consistent, using an nn-color construction.

Community submission (unverified) — August 26, 2026

A submitted proof argues that the equality holds for every signing. Its strategy decomposes each clique into paths or matchings using Walecki-type constructions, then assigns disjoint signed color pairs; this remains an unverified claim.

Current status (as of August 2026): The consistent-signature case is settled, while the arbitrary-signature conjecture remains open because the August 26, 2026 submitted proof is unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

Signed edge coloring of two cliques joined by one edge

Theorem

Let GnG_n be the graph obtained from two vertex-disjoint copies of KnK_n by adding one edge between them. For every signature σ:E(Gn){±1}\sigma:E(G_n)\to\{\pm1\},

χ(Gn,σ)=Δ(Gn)=n.\boxed{\chi'(G_n,\sigma)=\Delta(G_n)=n.}

This proves Conjecture 26 in Janczewski--Turowski--Wroblewski and resolves MathDB #361027.

We use the authors' convention

Mk={{0,±1,,±},k=2+1,{±1,,±},k=2,M_k= \begin{cases} \{0,\pm1,\ldots,\pm \ell\},&k=2\ell+1,\\ \{\pm1,\ldots,\pm \ell\},&k=2\ell, \end{cases}

under which a signed kk-edge-coloring assigns a color to every incidence and satisfies

f(u:uv)=σ(uv)f(v:uv)(1)f(u:uv)=-\sigma(uv)f(v:uv) \tag{1}

on each edge, with distinct colors on incidences sharing a vertex.

A path-coloring observation

Every arbitrarily signed path can be colored with one nonzero pair {±j}\{\pm j\}. Choose either color at the first incidence. Having colored the incidence at the near end of an edge, use (1) to color its far end; at an internal vertex use the opposite color on the next edge. Thus the two incidences at every internal vertex are jj and j-j, while (1) holds on every edge.

Consequently, if a graph is decomposed into paths, we may color different paths with disjoint color pairs and the edge signs impose no further restriction. A matching may similarly be colored with 00.

The needed Walecki decompositions

We record the relevant form of Walecki's construction. On {}Z2m\{\infty\}\cup\mathbb Z_{2m}, put

Ci=(,i,i1,i+1,i2,i+2,,i(m1),i+(m1),im,)(2)C_i=(\infty,i,i-1,i+1,i-2,i+2,\ldots, i-(m-1),i+(m-1),i-m,\infty) \tag{2}

for 0i<m0\le i<m, with finite labels read modulo 2m2m.

These mm Hamilton cycles partition K2m+1K_{2m+1}. Here is a short verification. The two edges at \infty in the cycles collectively join \infty once to every finite vertex. The finite edges in CiC_i are

{i+j1,ij}(1jm)(3)\{i+j-1,i-j\}\quad(1\le j\le m) \tag{3}

and

{ij,i+j}(1j<m).(4)\{i-j,i+j\}\quad(1\le j<m). \tag{4}

The edges in (3) have endpoint sum 2i12i-1, and those in (4) have endpoint sum 2i2i, modulo 2m2m. For each odd sum there are exactly mm unordered non-loop pairs, all listed by (3) for the unique ii; for each even sum there are exactly m1m-1, all listed by (4). Hence every finite edge occurs exactly once.

Two consequences will be used.

  1. Deleting \infty from every cycle in (2) gives an edge decomposition of K2mK_{2m} into mm Hamilton paths. Each finite vertex is an endpoint of exactly one of the paths, because its unique edge to \infty was deleted.

  2. In each cycle in (2), the central edge of the displayed finite sequence has endpoints differing by mm. The mm central edges are distinct, so they are precisely the diameter perfect matching of Z2m\mathbb Z_{2m}. Deleting one central edge from each cycle therefore decomposes K2m+1K_{2m+1} into mm Hamilton paths and that perfect matching. The vertex \infty is internal to every path and is uncovered by the matching. By relabeling, \infty may be any prescribed vertex.

Even nn

Let n=2mn=2m. In each copy of KnK_n, use consequence 1 and color its mm Hamilton paths with the disjoint pairs

{±1},,{±m}.\{\pm1\},\ldots,\{\pm m\}.

At every vertex exactly one of those Hamilton paths ends and all the others pass through. In particular, the vertex incident with the joining edge sees both colors from m1m-1 pairs and one color from the remaining pair. It therefore misses exactly one member of MnM_n.

Order the path pairs in the two cliques so that the path ending at each joining vertex uses the same absolute color. Reversing all incidence colors on one path preserves (1) and lets us choose which sign is missing. Thus, if the missing colors at the two joining vertices are xx and yy, we may arrange

x=σ(e)y.(5)x=-\sigma(e)y. \tag{5}

Color the two incidences of the joining edge by xx and yy. Equation (5) is exactly (1), and the colors are proper because they were missing at their respective endpoints. This is an nn-edge-coloring of the whole signed graph.

Odd nn

Let n=2m+1n=2m+1. In each clique apply consequence 2 with its joining vertex as \infty. Color the mm Hamilton paths with {±1},,{±m}\{\pm1\},\ldots,\{\pm m\}, and color the remaining perfect matching with 00.

The joining vertex lies internally on every Hamilton path and is uncovered by the matching. It consequently sees every nonzero member of MnM_n and misses exactly 00. Assign 00 to both incidences of the joining edge. They are proper at their endpoints and satisfy

0=σ(e)00=-\sigma(e)0

regardless of the sign of the joining edge.

Conclusion

The case n=1n=1 is a single signed edge and is colored by 00. For every n2n\ge2, the preceding constructions give an nn-edge-coloring. The two joining vertices have degree nn, so no coloring with fewer than nn colors is possible. Therefore

χ(Gn,σ)=n=Δ(Gn)\chi'(G_n,\sigma)=n=\Delta(G_n)

for every signature, as claimed.

Lean: https://github.com/antoshashakov/Principia-Math-In-Progress/blob/main/mathdb-open-problems/problems/361027/Problem361027.lean

Solved by the Principia Math harness. Check out our work at principia-math.com

Models used: GPT 5.6 Sol, Fable