Non-tensorial norm estimate for random matrices with Weibull entries

From papers

Assume that r\range[1,2]r\range[1,2], (ai,j)im,jn(a_{i,j})_{i\le m,j\le n} is a deterministic m×nm\times n matrix, and (Xi,j)im,jn(X_{i,j})_{i\le m,j\le n} are independent identically distributed symmetric Weibull random variables with parameter rr. Let

D3,r={Emaxim,jnai,jXi,jif p2q,maxjnbjln1/r(j+1)if pq2,maximdiln1/r(i+1)if 2pq,0ifq<p.D_{3,r}=\begin{cases} {\mathbb E}\max_{i\le m,j\le n}|a_{i,j}X_{i,j}| & \text{if }p\le 2\le q,\\ \max_{j\le n}b_j^*\ln^{1/r}(j+1) & \text{if }p\le q\le 2,\\ \max_{i\le m}d_i^*\ln^{1/r}(i+1) & \text{if }2\le p\le q,\\ 0 & \operatorname{if }q<p. \end{cases}

Is it true that

E(ai,jXi,j)i,j:pnqmp,qD1+D2+D3,r?{\mathbb E}\left\|(a_{i,j}X_{i,j})_{i,j}:\ell_p^n\to\ell_q^m\right\|\sim_{p,q}D_1+D_2+D_{3,r}?

Non-tensorial Weibull norm conjecture. The expected operator norm is comparable, with constants depending on pp and qq, to D1+D2+D3,rD_1+D_2+D_{3,r}.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Rafał Latała and Marta Strzelecka, “Chevet-type inequalities for subexponential Weibull variables and estimates for norms of random matrices”, arXiv:2309.04214 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.