Lazić–Peternell's generalized abundance conjecture
Let be a projective manifold with pseudoeffective, and let be a nef line bundle such that
is nef for some . Lazić–Peternell's generalized abundance conjecture. Then is numerically semiample. This is known only when the dimension is at most two, so the conjecture remains open in higher dimensions.
References
Primary source
Valentino Tosatti, “Semipositive line bundles and (1,1)-classes”, arXiv:2309.00580 (2023).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 2
RemarkAI-assistedClaimed by OpenAI. The manuscript claims numerical semiampleness of nef adjoint classes on smooth compact Kahler manifolds. In the projective target setting, take the nef summand M = mL - K_X and boundary zero: the claimed semiample representative of K_X + M = mL yields a numerical semiample representative of L. This allows a change of flat part and does not assert semiampleness of the original bundle.See full solution
Claimed by OpenAI. The manuscript claims numerical semiampleness of nef adjoint classes on smooth compact Kahler manifolds. In the projective target setting, take the nef summand M = mL - K_X and boundary zero: the claimed semiample representative of K_X + M = mL yields a numerical semiample representative of L. This allows a change of flat part and does not assert semiampleness of the original bundle.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-036-01-Numerical-semiampleness-of-nef-adjoint-classes-on-compact-K-hler-manifolds.pdfOpen
RemarkAI-assistedClaimed by OpenAI. The manuscript claims numerical semiampleness of nef sums of a pseudo-effective rational klt log canonical adjoint and a nef rational divisor, using the stated log-abundance and minimal-model inputs. For this smooth projective target, M = mL - K_X gives adjoint sum mL, so its numerical semiample representative gives one for L. The conclusion is numerical, rather than semiampleness of L itself.See full solution
Claimed by OpenAI. The manuscript claims numerical semiampleness of nef sums of a pseudo-effective rational klt log canonical adjoint and a nef rational divisor, using the stated log-abundance and minimal-model inputs. For this smooth projective target, M = mL - K_X gives adjoint sum mL, so its numerical semiample representative gives one for L. The conclusion is numerical, rather than semiampleness of L itself.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-036-02-Numerical-Semiampleness-of-Nef-Adjoint-Divisors.pdfOpen