Square-free modulus conjecture for polynomial zero counts
Let be a square-free product of distinct primes, and let denote the number of distinct zeros of a random polynomial in . Write for the largest prime factor of . Square-free modulus conjecture. The expected value of is
Moreover, the distribution of is stable for . This conjecture concerns the distribution of zeros over square-free composite moduli; the surrounding text presents the claim as a numerical pattern, and no resolution is supplied.
References
Primary source
Ritik Jain, Han-Bom Moon and Peter Wu, “Distribution of the number of zeros of polynomials over a finite field”, arXiv:2308.14580 (2023).
Additional references
4 papers in this index state this conjecture (2008–2023). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1605.07765, arXiv:1009.5389, arXiv:0805.0775.
Progress summary
A posted attempt claims a complete proof of the conjecture, but no independent verification is available, so the result remains unconfirmed.
Jain, Moon, and Wu formulate the square-free-modulus conjecture: the expected zero count is , with distribution stable once . Their paper presents it as a numerical conjecture and supplies no proof.
Known results
- Jain, Moon, and Wu (2023) give the corresponding finite-field expected-value formula and describe the stable finite-field distribution for sufficiently large degree.
Posted attempt
A posted attempt claims a complete proof: for square-free , it asserts an independent-product description by binomial variables, proves stabilization at , and claims additional prime-power results. The attempt has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has an unverified complete-proof claim, but no corroborated resolution; absent verification, both the expected-value formula and the stated stabilization remain mathematically unsettled.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Complete proof of the square-free distribution conjecture, with sharp stabilization and an additional prime-power theorem.
Priority: The expected-value clause was already proved, in the greater generality of finite commutative rings, by Ritik Jain, arXiv:2409.06866v2, Theorem 2. The results proved here beyond that earlier theorem are the exact square-free probability distribution, the sharp stabilization threshold for every modulus, and the outstanding prime-power variance.
Let
where all coefficients are independent and uniform in , and write
If is square-free, the Chinese remainder theorem identifies the coefficient vector with independent uniform coefficient vectors modulo the . It also identifies the zero set with the Cartesian product of the corresponding field zero sets. Hence, for every ,
with independent factors.
If
evaluation over is surjective onto all functions
A uniform coefficient vector therefore gives independent uniform values at the input points. Consequently
In particular, its exact probability generating function is
This proves the conjectured degree stability and answers the source's accompanying probability-generating-function question.
More generally, for any integer , define
The monic polynomial
vanishes on every residue modulo , since
Division by separately in every variable shows that every polynomial function on has a representative of degree at most in each variable. Therefore the entire distribution of stabilizes for
This threshold is sharp. If , the function cannot have a representative of degree at most : otherwise subtraction and restriction to the first coordinate would give a monic null polynomial of degree , whose -st forward difference forces , a contradiction. Thus the evaluation images are strictly increasing, and
For square-free , , recovering the exact conjectured threshold.
Finally, for every , put
The linear coefficients make uniform on the ideal , while the independent constant coefficient makes uniform. Hence
and therefore
For and , this simplifies to
Thus the separate prime-power Conjecture 5.7 is also proved, including its variance and degree stabilization; the mean remains credited to Jain's earlier theorem.
The original conjectures are in Jain–Moon–Wu, Involve 18 (2025), 707–718, Conjectures 5.5 and 5.7.