Square-free modulus conjecture for polynomial zero counts

From papers

Let m=p1prm=p_1\cdots p_r be a square-free product of rr distinct primes, and let Kn,dmK_{n,d}^m denote the number of distinct zeros of a random polynomial in Z/mZ[x1,,xn](d,,d)\mathbb{Z}/m\mathbb{Z}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]_{(d,\ldots,d)}. Write prp_r for the largest prime factor of mm. Square-free modulus conjecture. The expected value of Kn,dmK_{n,d}^m is

E(Kn,dm)=mn1.E(K_{n,d}^m)=m^{n-1}.

Moreover, the distribution of Kn,dmK_{n,d}^m is stable for dpr1d\geq p_r-1. This conjecture concerns the distribution of zeros over square-free composite moduli; the surrounding text presents the claim as a numerical pattern, and no resolution is supplied.

Progress summary

Open

No public source reports a proof or counterexample: the conjecture remains open, including its claimed stabilization.

The conjecture asserts that the expected number of zeros is mn1m^{n-1} for square-free mm, and that the distribution becomes independent of dd once dpr1d\geq p_r-1. A paper records these as numerical observations and supplies no resolution.

Known results

  • Over a finite field, the analogous expected-value formula is proved, and the zero-count distribution is explicitly stable for dq1d\geq q-1; this does not settle the square-free composite-modulus case.

Current status (as of August 2026): The square-free-modulus expected-value formula and stabilization conjecture remain unproved, with no reported counterexample or verified progress.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ritik Jain, Han-Bom Moon and Peter Wu, “Distribution of the number of zeros of polynomials over a finite field”, arXiv:2308.14580 (2023).

Additional references

4 papers in this index state this conjecture (2008–2023). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1605.07765, arXiv:1009.5389, arXiv:0805.0775.

Solutions 1

Proof

Complete proof of the square-free distribution conjecture, with sharp stabilization and an additional prime-power theorem.

Priority: The expected-value clause was already proved, in the greater generality of finite commutative rings, by Ritik Jain, arXiv:2409.06866v2, Theorem 2. The results proved here beyond that earlier theorem are the exact square-free probability distribution, the sharp stabilization threshold for every modulus, and the outstanding prime-power variance.

Let

R=Z/mZ,f(X1,,Xn)=0a1,,andCa1,,anX1a1Xnan,R=\mathbb Z/m\mathbb Z,\qquad f(X_1,\ldots,X_n) = \sum_{0\le a_1,\ldots,a_n\le d} C_{a_1,\ldots,a_n}X_1^{a_1}\cdots X_n^{a_n},

where all coefficients are independent and uniform in RR, and write

Kn,dm=#{xRn:f(x)=0}.K_{n,d}^{m}=\#\{x\in R^n:f(x)=0\}.

If m=p1psm=p_1\cdots p_s is square-free, the Chinese remainder theorem identifies the coefficient vector with independent uniform coefficient vectors modulo the pip_i. It also identifies the zero set with the Cartesian product of the corresponding field zero sets. Hence, for every dd,

Kn,dm=lawi=1sKn,dpi,K_{n,d}^{m} \stackrel{\mathrm{law}}= \prod_{i=1}^{s}K_{n,d}^{p_i},

with independent factors.

If

dmax1is(pi1),d\ge\max_{1\le i\le s}(p_i-1),

evaluation over Fpi\mathbb F_{p_i} is surjective onto all functions

FpinFpi.\mathbb F_{p_i}^{\,n}\longrightarrow\mathbb F_{p_i}.

A uniform coefficient vector therefore gives independent uniform values at the pinp_i^n input points. Consequently

Kn,dm=lawi=1sBi,BiBin(pin,pi1) independently.\boxed{ K_{n,d}^{m} \stackrel{\mathrm{law}}= \prod_{i=1}^{s}B_i, \qquad B_i\sim\operatorname{Bin}(p_i^n,p_i^{-1}) \text{ independently}. }

In particular, its exact probability generating function is

E[tKn,dm]=j1=0p1njs=0psntj1jsi=1s(pinji)piji(1pi1)pinji.(1)\mathbb E[t^{K_{n,d}^{m}}] = \sum_{j_1=0}^{p_1^n}\cdots\sum_{j_s=0}^{p_s^n} t^{j_1\cdots j_s} \prod_{i=1}^s \binom{p_i^n}{j_i} p_i^{-j_i}(1-p_i^{-1})^{p_i^n-j_i}. \tag{1}

This proves the conjectured degree stability and answers the source's accompanying probability-generating-function question.

More generally, for any integer m2m\ge2, define

μ(m)=min{r1:mr!}.\mu(m)=\min\{r\ge1:m\mid r!\}.

The monic polynomial

Qr(X)=X(X1)(Xr+1),r=μ(m),Q_r(X)=X(X-1)\cdots(X-r+1),\qquad r=\mu(m),

vanishes on every residue modulo mm, since

Qr(x)=r!(xr).Q_r(x)=r!\binom{x}{r}.

Division by QrQ_r separately in every variable shows that every polynomial function on RnR^n has a representative of degree at most r1r-1 in each variable. Therefore the entire distribution of Kn,dmK_{n,d}^{m} stabilizes for

dμ(m)1.\boxed{d\ge\mu(m)-1.}

This threshold is sharp. If d<μ(m)1d<\mu(m)-1, the function X1d+1X_1^{d+1} cannot have a representative of degree at most dd: otherwise subtraction and restriction to the first coordinate would give a monic null polynomial of degree d+1d+1, whose (d+1)(d+1)-st forward difference forces m(d+1)!m\mid(d+1)!, a contradiction. Thus the evaluation images IdId+1I_d\subsetneq I_{d+1} are strictly increasing, and

Pr(Kn,dm=mn)=Id1>Id+11=Pr(Kn,d+1m=mn).\Pr(K_{n,d}^{m}=m^n)=|I_d|^{-1} > |I_{d+1}|^{-1} = \Pr(K_{n,d+1}^{m}=m^n).

For square-free mm, μ(m)=maxpmp\mu(m)=\max_{p\mid m}p, recovering the exact conjectured threshold.

Finally, for every d1d\ge1, put

g(h)=gcd(m,h1,,hn),hRn.g(h)=\gcd(m,h_1,\ldots,h_n),\qquad h\in R^n.

The linear coefficients make f(x+h)f(x)f(x+h)-f(x) uniform on the ideal g(h)Rg(h)R, while the independent constant coefficient makes f(x)f(x) uniform. Hence

Pr(f(x)=f(x+h)=0)=g(h)m2,\Pr(f(x)=f(x+h)=0)=\frac{g(h)}{m^2},

and therefore

Var(Kn,dm)=mn2hRng(h)m2n2.\operatorname{Var}(K_{n,d}^{m}) = m^{n-2}\sum_{h\in R^n}g(h)-m^{2n-2}.

For n=1n=1 and m=pam=p^a, this simplifies to

Var(K1,dpa)=a(11p)(d1).\boxed{ \operatorname{Var}(K_{1,d}^{p^a}) = a\left(1-\frac1p\right) \qquad(d\ge1). }

Thus the separate prime-power Conjecture 5.7 is also proved, including its variance and degree stabilization; the mean remains credited to Jain's earlier theorem.

The original conjectures are in Jain–Moon–Wu, Involve 18 (2025), 707–718, Conjectures 5.5 and 5.7.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·