Ambro--Kawamata effective non-vanishing conjecture

About 3 years old · traced to

Let (X,B)(X,B) be a projective klt pair and let LL be a nef line bundle on XX such that

L−(KX+B)L-(K_X+B)

is ample.

Ambro--Kawamata effective non-vanishing conjecture. Then

H0(X,L)≠0.H^0(X,L)\ne 0.

This conjecture is the effective non-vanishing input used in the paper to prove the Mukai-type conjecture for the total index. Its general validity is not established in the source.

Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Ambro–Kawamata effective non-vanishing conjecture

    Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a klt pair, and let HH be an ample Cartier divisor such that H−KX−ΔH-K_X-\Delta is ample.

    Ambro–Kawamata conjecture. One has

    H0(X,H)≠0.H^0(X,H) \neq 0.

    This is an effective non-vanishing statement for adjoint divisors. The paper proves it for the weighted complete intersections covered by its main theorem, while the general klt-pair statement remains open.

    source: Alessandro Passantino, “Effective non-vanishing for weighted complete intersections of low codimension”, arXiv:2501.13267 (2025).

References

Primary source

Yoshinori Gongyo, “Effective non-vanishing and Mukai type conjecture”, arXiv:2306.08841 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.