Banach cohomology and comparison conjecture for pp-adic period domains

Let IeI \triangleleft e \triangle and let iN0i \in \mathbb{N}_0. The cohomology groups

Hi(Frig\YI(ϵ),Eλ),HYI(ϵ)i(Frig,Eλ)H^i(\mathscr{F}^{\operatorname{rig}} \backslash Y_I^-(\epsilon),\mathcal{E}_\lambda),\qquad H^i_{Y_I^-(\epsilon)}(\mathscr{F}^{\operatorname{rig}},\mathcal{E}_\lambda)

are KK-Banach spaces, with the algebraic cohomology groups Hi(F\YI,Eλ)H^i(\mathscr{F} \backslash Y_I,\mathcal{E}_\lambda) and HYIi(F,Eλ)H^i_{Y_I}(\mathscr{F},\mathcal{E}_\lambda), respectively, as dense subspaces. Here F\mathscr{F} is the relevant flag variety, YIY_I is the corresponding closed subset, YI(ϵ)Y_I^-(\epsilon) is its rigid-analytic neighbourhood, Eλ\mathcal{E}_\lambda is the coefficient line bundle, and ϵm\epsilon_m is the specified cofinal sequence of radii. Write H^YI,mi\hat{H}^i_{Y_I,m} for the corresponding completed cohomology group.

Banach cohomology and comparison conjecture. There is an isomorphism of topological KK-vector spaces

limmNHYI(ϵm)i(Frig,Eλ)limmNH^YI,mi.\varprojlim_{m \in \mathbb{N}} H^i_{Y_I^-(\epsilon_m)}(\mathscr{F}^{\operatorname{rig}},\mathcal{E}_\lambda) \cong \varprojlim_{m \in \mathbb{N}} \hat{H}^i_{Y_I,m}.

The assertion is presented as an assumption and conjecture needed to control the Čech-computed rigid cohomology and compare it with algebraic and completed cohomology; the supplied source gives no resolution, so its status remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Christoph Spenke, “On the sheaf cohomology of some p-adic period domains with coefficients in certain line bundles”, arXiv:2303.12764 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.