Non-commutative Hodge-theoretic interpretation of holomorphic Floer theory

Let (M,ΩI)(M,\Omega_I) be holomorphic symplectic, set ωu=Re(u1ΩI)\omega_u=\operatorname{Re}(u^{-1}\Omega_I) and Bu=Im(u1ΩI)B_u=\operatorname{Im}(u^{-1}\Omega_I), and let F(M,ωu,Bu)F(M,\omega_u,B_u) be the corresponding Fukaya category. Holomorphic Floer Betti-data conjecture. The Betti data for the non-commutative Hodge theory of RW(M,ΩI)RW(M,\Omega_I) is induced by

DQ(M,ΩI)F(M,ωu,Bu)C(!(u) ⁣).DQ(M,\Omega_I)\simeq F(M,\omega_u,B_u)\otimes\mathbb{C}(!(u)\!).

Moreover, its Stokes data is induced by the holomorphic dependence of F(M,ωu,Bu)F(M,\omega_u,B_u) on uu and is determined by the relevant counts of JuJ_u-holomorphic curves. This is proposed as a reformulation of predictions associated with non-perturbative quantization and resurgence; the source gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Pierrick Bousseau, “Holomorphic Floer theory and Donaldson-Thomas invariants”, arXiv:2210.17001 (2025).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.