Non-word-representability conjecture for simplified de Bruijn graphs

About 4 years old · traced to

Let S(n,k)S(n,k) denote the simple graph obtained from the de Bruijn graph by removing orientations and loops and replacing multiple edges between a pair of vertices by a single edge. A graph is word-representable if there is a word over its vertex set in which two letters alternate if and only if they are adjacent.

Non-word-representability conjecture. All simplified de Bruijn graphs S(n,k)S(n,k) are non-word-representable for n≥4n\geq 4 and k≥3k\geq 3.

The paper proves that binary simplified de Bruijn graphs S(n,2)S(n,2) are word-representable for every n≥1n\geq 1, while S(2,k)S(2,k) and S(3,k)S(3,k) are non-word-representable for k≥3k\geq 3. The conjecture extends the latter non-word-representability results to all alphabet sizes n≥4n\geq 4 when k≥3k\geq 3.

References

Primary source

Anthony V. Petyuk, “On word-representability of simplified de Bruijn graphs”, arXiv:2210.14762 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.