Non-word-representability conjecture for simplified de Bruijn graphs

From papers

Let S(n,k)S(n,k) denote the simple graph obtained from the de Bruijn graph by removing orientations and loops and replacing multiple edges between a pair of vertices by a single edge. A graph is word-representable if there is a word over its vertex set in which two letters alternate if and only if they are adjacent.

Non-word-representability conjecture. All simplified de Bruijn graphs S(n,k)S(n,k) are non-word-representable for n4n\geq 4 and k3k\geq 3.

The paper proves that binary simplified de Bruijn graphs S(n,2)S(n,2) are word-representable for every n1n\geq 1, while S(2,k)S(2,k) and S(3,k)S(3,k) are non-word-representable for k3k\geq 3. The conjecture extends the latter non-word-representability results to all alphabet sizes n4n\geq 4 when k3k\geq 3.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Anthony V. Petyuk, “On word-representability of simplified de Bruijn graphs”, arXiv:2210.14762 (2023).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.