Tightness of the quadratic Gromov–Wasserstein correspondence-plan theorem

About 4 years old · traced to

Let μ\mu and ν\nu be probability measures in the setting of the quadratic Gromov–Wasserstein problem. An optimal correspondence plan is a transport plan attaining the optimum for the quadratic Gromov–Wasserstein objective, and a plan is a map when it is induced by a measurable transport map; an anti-map is the analogous graph of a map with reversed orientation.

Tightness conjecture. Theorem is tight: there exist μ\mu and ν\nu for which optimal correspondence plans for the quadratic Gromov–Wasserstein problem are not maps, but are instead a union of two graphs, namely the graphs of two maps or of one map and one anti-map. This can occur even when μ\mu has a density.

The claim gives empirical evidence that the theorem cannot be strengthened to guarantee that an optimal correspondence plan is a map, despite the classical optimal-transport condition that absolute continuity of μ\mu yields an optimal transport map.

References

Primary source

Théo Dumont, Théo Lacombe and François-Xavier Vialard, “On the existence of Monge maps for the Gromov-Wasserstein problem”, arXiv:2210.11945 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.