Vertical asymptotics conjecture for the meromorphic 3D-index

Let Imer(0,0)I^{\mathrm{mer}}(0,0) be the meromorphic 3D-index of a hyperbolic knot, let σ\sigma range over the relevant boundary-parabolic PSL2(\mathbbmC)\operatorname{PSL}_2(\mathbbm C)-representations, and let Φ^n(σ)\widehat{\Phi}^{(\sigma)}_n and Φ^(σ)(x,)\widehat{\Phi}^{(\sigma)}(x,\hbar) be the associated discrete and xx-deformed asymptotic series. For each σ\sigma, let CσC_\sigma be the contour appearing in the period contribution. Meromorphic vertical asymptotics conjecture. When τ0\tau\downarrow0 vertically,

Imer(0,0)(e2πiτ)σcomplexn\mathbbmZΦ^n(σ)(2πiτ)Φ^n(σˉ)(2πiτ)+12πiτσCσΦ^(σ)(eτu,2πiτ)Φ^(σ)(eτu,2πiτ)du.I^\mathrm{mer}(0,0)(e^{2 \pi i \tau}) \sim \sum_{\sigma\,\,\mathrm{complex}} \sum_{n \in \mathbbm Z} \widehat{\Phi}^{(\sigma)}_n(2\pi i \tau) \widehat{\Phi}^{(\bar\sigma)}_n(-2\pi i \tau) + \frac{1}{2\pi i \tau} \sum_{\sigma} \int_{C_\sigma} \widehat{\Phi}^{(\sigma)}(e^{\tau u},2\pi i \tau) \widehat{\Phi}^{(\sigma)}(e^{\tau u},-2\pi i \tau)\,du.

The second term consists of period contributions associated with branches of the AA-polynomial curve, explaining why periods rather than only algebraic coefficients occur in the vertical asymptotics of the meromorphic index. The claim is presented as a conjectural asymptotic formula and remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Stavros Garoufalidis and Campbell Wheeler, “Periods, the meromorphic 3D-index and the Turaev–Viro invariant”, arXiv:2209.02843 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.