Antipodal code coefficient conjecture under the Assmus–Mattson condition

At least 3 years old · documented by

Let CC) be a binary antipodal [n,k][n,k] code with weight enumerator

WC(x,y)=xn+∑i≥1αixn−diydi+yn.W_C(x,y)=x^n+\sum_{i\geq 1}\alpha_i x^{n-d_i}y^{d_i}+y^n.

Assume that CC satisfies the Assmus–Mattson condition with d⊥−t=ℓd^\perp-t=\ell, where ℓ≥6\ell\geq 6, and that d⊥≥2ℓ+2d^\perp\geq 2\ell+2.

Antipodal code coefficient conjecture. One has

{1+α1+⋯+αℓ/2=∑i=0ℓ(n−1i)=2k−1if ℓ≡0(mod2),1+α1+⋯+α⌈ℓ/2⌉2=∑i=0ℓ(n−1i)=2k−1if ℓ≡1(mod2),\begin{cases} \displaystyle 1+\alpha_1+\cdots+\alpha_{\ell/2}=\sum_{i=0}^{\ell}\binom{n-1}{i}=2^{k-1} & \text{if } \ell\equiv 0\pmod{2},\\\\ \displaystyle 1+\alpha_1+\cdots+\frac{\alpha_{\lceil\ell/2\rceil}}{2}=\sum_{i=0}^{\ell}\binom{n-1}{i}=2^{k-1} & \text{if } \ell\equiv 1\pmod{2}, \end{cases}

Moreover, t≤ℓt\leq\ell.

This conjecture proposes a general relation between the weight-enumerator coefficients of antipodal binary codes and the Assmus–Mattson parameters when ℓ≥6\ell\geq 6; the preceding cases d⊥−t=4d^\perp-t=4 and d⊥−t=5d^\perp-t=5 motivate it, while the asserted identities and the bound on tt remain to be established in the stated generality.

References

Primary source

Eiichi Bannai, Tsuyoshi Miezaki and Hiroyuki Nakasora, “A note on the Assmus–Mattson theorem for some binary codes II”, arXiv:2208.09077 (2023).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.