Kontsevich–Soibelman motivic integral identity conjecture

From papers

Let kk be the coefficient field, let d1,d2,d3d_1,d_2,d_3 be nonnegative integers, and write x=(x1,,xd1)x=(x_1,\ldots,x_{d_1}), y=(y1,,yd2)y=(y_1,\ldots,y_{d_2}), and z=(z1,,zd3)z=(z_1,\ldots,z_{d_3}). For a tuple xx and a new variable tt, write tx=(tx1,,txd1)tx=(tx_1,\ldots,tx_{d_1}). Let fk[[x,y,z]]f \in k[[x,y,z]] satisfy f(0,0,0)=0f(0,0,0)=0 and

f(tx,y,z)=f(x,ty,z)f(tx,y,z)=f(x,ty,z)

in k[[x,y,z,t]]k[[x,y,z,t]]. Then ff is a series in k{x}[[y,z]]k\{x\}[[y,z]]. Writing f~(z)=f(0,0,z)k[[z]]\tilde f(z)=f(0,0,z)\in k[[z]], the Kontsevich–Soibelman conjecture asserts that

Akd1Sf=Ld1Sf~,0\int_{\mathbb A^{d_1}_k}\mathscr S_f=\mathbb L^{d_1}\mathscr S_{\tilde f,0}

holds in Mkμ^\mathscr M_k^{\hat\mu}. This identity is a building block in Kontsevich–Soibelman's theory of motivic Donaldson–Thomas invariants for noncommutative Calabi–Yau threefolds and would imply their existence directly; its resolution status is not specified in the supplied text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hong Duc Nguyen, “Motivic integration on special rigid varieties and the motivic integral identity conjecture”, arXiv:2208.03921 (2024).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.