Kontsevich–Soibelman motivic integral identity conjecture

At least 3 years old · documented by

Let kk be the coefficient field, let d1,d2,d3d_1,d_2,d_3 be nonnegative integers, and write x=(x1,…,xd1)x=(x_1,\ldots,x_{d_1}), y=(y1,…,yd2)y=(y_1,\ldots,y_{d_2}), and z=(z1,…,zd3)z=(z_1,\ldots,z_{d_3}). For a tuple xx and a new variable tt, write tx=(tx1,…,txd1)tx=(tx_1,\ldots,tx_{d_1}). Let f∈k[[x,y,z]]f \in k[[x,y,z]] satisfy f(0,0,0)=0f(0,0,0)=0 and

f(tx,y,z)=f(x,ty,z)f(tx,y,z)=f(x,ty,z)

in k[[x,y,z,t]]k[[x,y,z,t]]. Then ff is a series in k{x}[[y,z]]k\{x\}[[y,z]]. Writing f~(z)=f(0,0,z)∈k[[z]]\tilde f(z)=f(0,0,z)\in k[[z]], the Kontsevich–Soibelman conjecture asserts that

∫Akd1Sf=Ld1Sf~,0\int_{\mathbb A^{d_1}_k}\mathscr S_f=\mathbb L^{d_1}\mathscr S_{\tilde f,0}

holds in Mkμ^\mathscr M_k^{\hat\mu}. This identity is a building block in Kontsevich–Soibelman's theory of motivic Donaldson–Thomas invariants for noncommutative Calabi–Yau threefolds and would imply their existence directly; its resolution status is not specified in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Hong Duc Nguyen, “Motivic integration on special rigid varieties and the motivic integral identity conjecture”, arXiv:2208.03921 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.