Crude Siegel–Weil formula for theta correspondences

Let 1leq<n1 leq \ell<n. Let θΔ(τ,)\theta_{\Delta(\tau,\ell)} and θΔ(τ,2n+)\theta_{\Delta(\tau,2n+\ell)} be given \theta functions, and let fΔ(τ,2n),sf'_{\Delta(\tau,2n),s} be a section of the relevant induced representation. For hSp8n(A)h\in \operatorname{Sp}_{8n}(\mathbb A), Crude Siegel–Weil formula. There is a choice of fΔ(τ,2n),sf'_{\Delta(\tau,2n),s} such that

Sp4(F)\Sp4(A)θΔ(τ,2n+)(g,h)θΔ(τ,)(g)dg=Ress=nE(fΔ(τ,2n),s)(h).\int_{\operatorname{Sp}_{4\ell}(F)\backslash \operatorname{Sp}_{4\ell}(\mathbb A)}\theta_{\Delta(\tau,2n+\ell)}(g,h)\theta_{\Delta(\tau,\ell)}(g)\,dg=\operatorname{Res}_{s=n-\ell}E(f'_{\Delta(\tau,2n),s})(h).

This is proposed as a formal Siegel–Weil-type identity: the theta integral is expected to be represented by a residue of an Eisenstein series, although convergence and the precise choice of section remain to be established.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

David Ginzburg and David Soudry, “A new regularized Siegel-Weil type formula, part I”, arXiv:2207.12818 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.