The directed Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for tournaments
Let be a tournament, meaning an orientation of a complete graph. A tournament is transitive if it contains no directed cycle; an -free tournament contains no induced subtournament isomorphic to .
Directed Erdős–Hajnal conjecture. For every tournament , there exists such that every -free tournament with vertices contains a transitive subtournament of order at least .
Alon et al. proved that this tournament formulation is equivalent to the graph formulation of the Erdős–Hajnal conjecture. The conjecture remains open in general.
Equivalent formulations 1Other wordings
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
Directed Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for tournaments
Let be a tournament. A tournament is -free if it does not contain an induced subtournament isomorphic to , and a transitive subtournament is a subtournament containing no directed cycle. Directed Erdős–Hajnal conjecture. For every tournament there exists such that every -free tournament with vertices contains a transitive subtournament of size at least . Alon et al. proved that this tournament formulation is equivalent to the undirected Erdős–Hajnal conjecture; the conjecture itself remains open.
source: Soukaina Zayat and Salman Ghazal, “Erdös-Hajnal Conjecture for New Infinite Families of Tournaments”, arXiv:2010.12329 (2022).
References
Primary source
Soukaina Zayat, “Forests and the Strong Erdos-Hajnal Property”, arXiv:2207.09146 (2022).
Additional references
3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2015–2022). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2010.12330, arXiv:1506.08480.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.