Conjecture that the display-to-local-Shimura comparison morphism is an isomorphism

Assume that the Bültel–Pappas moduli functor is representable, and let (MBP)η(\mathcal{M}^{\operatorname{BP}})_\eta be its generic fibre over Spa(E˘)\operatorname{Spa}(\breve{E}). Restrict this sheaf and the local Shimura variety ShK\operatorname{Sh}_K to the category of smooth complete affinoid adic spaces over Spa(E˘)\operatorname{Spa}(\breve{E}). The comparison morphism of sheaves

Υsm ⁣:(MBP)η ⁣SmAffdSpa(E˘)ShK ⁣SmAffdSpa(E˘)\Upsilon^{\mathrm{sm}}\colon (\mathcal{M}^{\operatorname{BP}})_\eta\!\mid_{\operatorname{SmAffd}_{\operatorname{Spa}(\breve{E})}}\rightarrow \operatorname{Sh}_K\!\mid_{\operatorname{SmAffd}_{\operatorname{Spa}(\breve{E})}}

Comparison-isomorphism conjecture. The morphism Υsm\Upsilon^{\mathrm{sm}} is an isomorphism.

This predicts that the generic fibre of the Bültel–Pappas display moduli problem agrees with the associated local Shimura variety on smooth affinoid adic spaces. The source supplies no resolution status, so it is recorded as open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sebastian Bartling, “G-μ-displays and local shtuka”, arXiv:2206.13194 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.