Ihara's lemma in the bottom homological degree

Let KK and vv be as in the paper's level-lowering setup, and let mTS(K)\mathfrak{m}\subseteq\mathbb{T}^S(K) be a non-Eisenstein maximal ideal. Let

πK,v ⁣:(CKK0(v))m(CK)m2\pi_{K,v}\colon (C_{K\cap K_0(v)})_{\mathfrak{m}}\to(C_K)_{\mathfrak{m}}^{\oplus2}

be the level-lowering map. Ihara's lemma conjecture. The induced map

Hr1+r2(YKK0(v),O)mHr1+r2(YK,O)m2\operatorname{H}_{r_1+r_2}(Y_{K\cap K_0(v)},\mathcal{O})_{\mathfrak{m}}\to\operatorname{H}_{r_1+r_2}(Y_K,\mathcal{O})_{\mathfrak{m}}^{\oplus2}

is surjective. This is the higher-dimensional analogue of Ihara's lemma and is used in level raising and modularity-lifting arguments; the supplied text gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Srikanth B. Iyengar, Chandrashekhar B. Khare and Jeffrey Manning, “Congruence modules and the Wiles-Lenstra-Diamond numerical criterion in higher codimensions”, arXiv:2206.08212 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.