Formal identity conjecture for the stratification coefficients

From papers

Let A0,1A_{0,1} and As,1A_{s,1} be the matrices occurring in the coefficient recursion, put

a=A0,1β,a=\frac{-A_{0,1}}{\beta},

and let f~(T)=i=0aiTiMl×l(K)[[T]]\tilde f(T)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}a_iT^i\in M_{l\times l}(K)[[T]] with a0=1a_0=1. For k1k\geq1, define aka_k inductively by

ak=1kβ(i+s=k\ik1(di+a,s,1aiAs,1)ai).a_k=\frac{1}{k\beta}\left(\sum_{\substack{i+s=k\i\leq k-1}}(d_{i+a,s,1}a_i-A_{s,1})a_i\right).

Formal identity conjecture. One has

αaf~(αt)f~(t)=m0(n0Am,nX1[n])tm.\alpha^a\frac{\tilde f(\alpha t)}{\tilde f(t)}=\sum_{m\geq0}\left(\sum_{n\geq 0}A_{m,n}X_1^{[n]}\right)t^m.

Here αa\alpha^a is defined using the convergence property of A0,1A_{0,1}. This identity is intended to imply the cocycle condition for the associated stratification.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Zeyu Liu, “De Rham prismatic crystals over O_K”, arXiv:2205.14914 (2022).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.