Gaussian Markov-process limit for the birth Mallows jump count
Gaussian Markov-process limit for the birth Mallows jump count
For the birth Mallows process, let be the number of jumps by time . Gaussian Markov-limit conjecture. As tends to infinity,
where is a centred Gaussian and Markovian process. A one-time central limit theorem is stated before this conjecture, while convergence of the full process and identification of its distribution remain open.
Progress summary
A reader-posted argument, not independently checked, claims the whole evolving count has a Brownian-motion limit, beyond the original paper’s result at one time.
Corsini posed the Gaussian Markov-process conjecture in 2022 for the normalized jump-count process of the birth Mallows process. The paper explicitly leaves both process-level convergence and identification of the limiting law open.
Known results
- Corsini (2022) proves that, for each fixed , the normalized count converges to .
- The same paper establishes the conjectured formulation with a centred Gaussian Markovian limit as an open problem.
Posted attempt
A complete functional-limit argument claims convergence in for every , with standard Brownian motion as the limit, and local convergence on . The attempt is not independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): the fixed-time central limit theorem is established, but the process-level conjecture is supported only by an unverified complete-proof claim.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Benoît Corsini, “Continuous-time Mallows processes”, arXiv:2205.04967 (2022).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Complete functional limit theorem. Let be the jump count of Corsini's birth Mallows process on . For every ,
where is standard Brownian motion. Thus the conjectured Gaussian Markov limit exists and is explicitly identified, with covariance . The convergence also holds locally on .
The source constructs the process using independent inversion-coordinate birth processes , , with
The finite birth rate simplifies exactly to
Indeed, because jumps have unit size, the probability current across state is
which gives the displayed formula directly. In particular,
Let be independent Yule birth processes started at zero, with jump rate
Their laws are . Independently for each , couple to by accepting a Yule jump, when the current states are , with probability
The accepted intensity is exactly . Therefore is nonnegative and nondecreasing. The exact geometric means give
Consequently,
Hence almost surely, and for every ,
In particular, the normalized path discrepancy is almost surely.
Now set
The birth intensity makes a centered square-integrable martingale:
Its predictable bracket is
Since
independence gives the quantitative uniform bracket bound
Furthermore, . The martingale functional central limit theorem therefore yields in , with standard Brownian motion. Finally,
Slutsky's theorem proves the stated functional convergence for every .
Prior-work distinction. The Yule thinning itself appears in Adamczak–Kotowski (2025), which proves different global and local limits. The argument above uses its summable error to establish the missing Brownian functional fluctuation theorem. Dubach (2026) analyzes a different coupling and explicitly leaves extensions to regular Mallows processes and Skorohod convergence open.
Original statement: Corsini's arXiv version, Conjecture 6, §4.3; the revised author manuscript renumbers the same statement as Conjecture 5.