Gaussian limiting distribution for the three-letter pair count

From papers

Let X3(n)X^{(n)}_3 denote the number of distinct adjacent pairs of distinct letters in a geometrically distributed word of length nn. Gaussian-limit conjecture. The asymptotic distribution of X3(n)X^{(n)}_3 is Gaussian.

The claim concerns the limiting law of the statistic counting distinct adjacent pairs with unequal letters. The surrounding discussion derives cumulant asymptotics and indicates that controlling the dependence corrections would establish Gaussian asymptotics, but does not provide such bounds.

Progress summary

Open

The conjecture remains open: the available paper gives only a heuristic Gaussian argument, and no rigorous proof has appeared.

The conjecture, stated as Conjecture 4.14, concerns the limiting distribution of X3(n)X^{(n)}_3, the number of distinct adjacent pairs of unequal letters in a geometrically distributed word. The source explicitly says its proposed proof is non-rigorous and that a rigorous proof remains unavailable.

Known results

  • An independent proxy with matching one-variable marginals is argued to satisfy a central limit theorem via cumulant estimates.
  • The variance difference between X3(n)X^{(n)}_3 and the proxy is reported as O(1)O(1).
  • Higher-cumulant dependence corrections have not been bounded sufficiently to transfer the proxy result.
  • Earlier work establishes expectation and related asymptotic formulas, but not the Gaussian limit.

Current status (as of August 2026): The Gaussian-limit conjecture for X3(n)X^{(n)}_3 remains open; only heuristic and proxy-model arguments are recorded, with no verified proof or counterexample.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).

Additional references

3 papers in this index state this conjecture (2011–2022). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1903.00457, arXiv:1106.6072.

Solutions 1

Proof

Proof of the full Gaussian limiting-distribution conjecture for every geometric parameter.

Fix 0<p<10<p<1, write q=1pq=1-p, and let independent letters satisfy Pi=Pr(Zr=i)=pqi1P_i=\Pr(Z_r=i)=pq^{i-1}. For distinct ordered pairs set

Iij=1{r<n:(Zr,Zr+1)=(i,j)},Xn=ijIij.I_{ij}=\mathbf1\{\exists r<n:(Z_r,Z_{r+1})=(i,j)\}, \qquad X_n=\sum_{i\ne j}I_{ij}.

We prove

XnEXnVar(Xn)N(0,1).\frac{X_n-\mathbb EX_n}{\sqrt{\operatorname{Var}(X_n)}} \Longrightarrow N(0,1).

1. Common-letter rows have uniformly bounded fluctuations. Independent disjoint position trials and a union bound give

Pr(Iij=0)en/2PiPj,Pr(Iij=1)nPiPj.\Pr(I_{ij}=0)\le e^{-\lfloor n/2\rfloor P_iP_j}, \qquad \Pr(I_{ij}=1)\le nP_iP_j.

For fixed ii, let jij_i be the last index with nPiPji1nP_iP_{j_i}\ge1. Relative to the deterministic cutoff di=#{jji:ji}d_i=\#\{j\le j_i:j\ne i\}, Minkowski's inequality gives

jiIijdi2r0eqr/6+r1q(r1)/2=:Cq<.\left\|\sum_{j\ne i}I_{ij}-d_i\right\|_2 \le \sum_{r\ge0}e^{-q^{-r}/6} + \sum_{r\ge1}q^{(r-1)/2} =:C_q<\infty.

The same estimate holds for columns and restricted rows. Put L=lognL=\log n,

K=10logLlogq,ρ=qKL10.K=\left\lceil\frac{10\log L}{|\log q|}\right\rceil, \qquad \rho=q^K\le L^{-10}.

If EnE_n counts all directed unequal pair types with at least one letter at most KK, summing the row and column bounds gives

EnEEn2=O(K)=O(loglogn).(1)\|E_n-\mathbb EE_n\|_2=O(K)=O(\log\log n). \tag{1}

2. Poisson coupling for rare central types. Among i,j>Ki,j>K, iji\ne j, declare types with nPiPj>L4nP_iP_j>L^4 saturated. Their simultaneous occupancy fails with probability O(L2)eL4/3O(L^2)e^{-L^4/3}. For the remaining types use occurrence indicators

Wr,i,j=1{Zr=i,Zr+1=j}.W_{r,i,j}=\mathbf1\{Z_r=i,Z_{r+1}=j\}.

Their dependency neighborhoods are precisely the occurrence indices whose positions differ by at most one. Set b=L4/nb=L^4/n and

Rj=i>KiPjbPimin(ρ,bpPj).R_j=\sum_{\substack{i>K\P_iP_j\le b}}P_i \le\min\left(\rho,\frac{b}{pP_j}\right).

Geometric summation, split at Pj=b/(pρ)P_j=b/(p\rho), gives

S=rarePiPj=O(bL),H=j>KPjRj2=O(ρb).S=\sum_{\rm rare}P_iP_j=O(bL), \qquad H=\sum_{j>K}P_jR_j^2=O(\rho b).

Hence the Chen--Stein dependency sums satisfy

b13nS2=O(L10/n),b22nH=O(L6),b3=0.b_1\le3nS^2=O(L^{10}/n), \qquad b_2\le2nH=O(L^{-6}), \qquad b_3=0.

The point-process theorem of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon therefore couples the entire rare-type occupancy field to independent variables

Bij=1{Nij>0},NijPois((n1)PiPj),B_{ij}=\mathbf1\{N_{ij}>0\}, \qquad N_{ij}\sim\operatorname{Pois}((n-1)P_iP_j),

with total-variation error

δn=O(L10/n+L6).(2)\delta_n=O(L^{10}/n+L^{-6}). \tag{2}

Let Cn=XnEnC_n=X_n-E_n and

Vn=#{saturated central types}+rareBij.V_n=\#\{\text{saturated central types}\} +\sum_{\rm rare}B_{ij}.

Truncating letters above J=12L/logqJ=\lceil12L/|\log q|\rceil costs O(n11)O(n^{-11}). The remaining counts are bounded by J2=O(L2)J^2=O(L^2), so (2) yields

ECnEVn=O(L2δn)+o(1)=o(1),|\mathbb EC_n-\mathbb EV_n|=O(L^2\delta_n)+o(1)=o(1), Var(Cn)Var(Vn)=O(L4δn)+o(1)=o(1).(3)|\operatorname{Var}(C_n)-\operatorname{Var}(V_n)| =O(L^4\delta_n)+o(1)=o(1). \tag{3}

3. Independent triangular-array central limit theorem. Independence gives

σn2=Var(Vn)=rareeλij(1eλij),λij=(n1)p2qi+j2.\sigma_n^2=\operatorname{Var}(V_n) =\sum_{\rm rare}e^{-\lambda_{ij}}(1-e^{-\lambda_{ij}}), \qquad \lambda_{ij}=(n-1)p^2q^{i+j-2}.

Choose unu_n with 1(n1)p2qun2<q11\le(n-1)p^2q^{u_n-2}<q^{-1}. The antidiagonal i+j=uni+j=u_n contains Θ(L)\Theta(L) admissible ordered types, each contributing variance bounded below by a positive constant. Summing adjacent antidiagonals using

eλ(1eλ)min(λ,eλ)e^{-\lambda}(1-e^{-\lambda})\le\min(\lambda,e^{-\lambda})

also gives the matching upper bound. Therefore

σn2=Θ(logn).\sigma_n^2=\Theta(\log n).

The independent centered Bernoulli summands are bounded, so the Lindeberg theorem yields

VnEVnσnN(0,1).\frac{V_n-\mathbb EV_n}{\sigma_n}\Longrightarrow N(0,1).

By (2)--(3) this transfers to CnC_n, and (1) contributes only O(loglogn)=o(logn)O(\log\log n)=o(\sqrt{\log n}) in L2L^2. Moreover,

Var(Xn)=σn2+O(lognloglogn+(loglogn)2)=σn2(1+o(1)).\operatorname{Var}(X_n) =\sigma_n^2+O(\sqrt{\log n}\log\log n+(\log\log n)^2) =\sigma_n^2(1+o(1)).

Slutsky's theorem proves the displayed Gaussian limit.

This resolves Conjecture 4.14 in Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023), pp. 30–31, whose published heuristic expressly leaves a rigorous proof open. The separate bounded-cumulant conjecture is not needed here.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·