Limiting-distribution equivalence for identical-letter pair counts

From papers

Let X1(n)X^{(n)}_1 be the number of distinct adjacent pairs of identical letters in a geometrically distributed word of length nn, and let ξ(n)\xi^{(n)} be the sum of independent random variables ξi(n)\xi_i^{(n)} with Poisson(nPi2)(nP_i^2) distributions. Limiting-distribution conjecture. For any tRt\in\mathbb{R},

limn[P(X1(n)t)P(ξ(n)t)]=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\left[\mathbb{P}(X^{(n)}_1\le t)-\mathbb{P}(\xi^{(n)}\le t)\right]=0.

This is stated as a weaker alternative to the higher-moment conjecture. It proposes that the distribution functions of the dependent statistic and its independent Poisson approximation become asymptotically indistinguishable.

Progress summary

Open

The proposed equivalence remains an unproved conjecture; earlier work only establishes matching long-run variance and a conditional description of the limit.

A 2022 paper conjectures that the dependent count of distinct identical adjacent pairs and its independent Poisson approximation have asymptotically identical distribution functions for every threshold. It presents this as a weaker alternative to a stronger conjecture on centered absolute moments.

Known results

  • The paper proves limn(VarX1(n)Varξ(n))=0\lim_{n\to\infty}(\operatorname{Var}X^{(n)}_1-\operatorname{Var}\xi^{(n)})=0.
  • It proves the explicit limiting distribution only conditionally: the formula follows if the limiting-distribution conjecture holds.
  • Earlier work establishes asymptotic formulas for EX1(n)\mathbb{E}X^{(n)}_1, but not the conjectured distributional equivalence.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains open; asymptotic variance matching and a conditional limit theorem are known, but no proof, counterexample, or verified claimed resolution was found.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).

Additional references

8 papers in this index state this conjecture (2001–2022). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2005.12349, arXiv:1912.12277, arXiv:1903.09615, arXiv:1806.08732, arXiv:1211.7206, arXiv:1206.4853, arXiv:math/0112196.

Solutions 1

Proof

Proof of the full limiting-distribution conjecture, uniformly over every threshold.

Fix 0<p<10<p<1, put q=1pq=1-p, and let Pi=pqi1P_i=pq^{i-1}. For independent geometric letters Z1,,ZnZ_1,\ldots,Z_n, define

In,i=1{r<n:Zr=Zr+1=i},Xn=i1In,i.I_{n,i}=\mathbf 1\{\exists r<n: Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\},\qquad X_n=\sum_{i\ge1}I_{n,i}.

Independently let Yn,iPois(nPi2)Y_{n,i}\sim\operatorname{Pois}(nP_i^2), Jn,i=1{Yn,i>0}J_{n,i}=\mathbf1\{Y_{n,i}>0\}, and ξn=i1Jn,i\xi_n=\sum_{i\ge1}J_{n,i}.

Write L=lognL=\log n, and choose the smallest a=ana=a_n with nPa2L4nP_a^2\le L^4. Then a=Op(L)a=O_p(L), q2L4<nPa2L4q^2L^4<nP_a^2\le L^4, and nPi2>L4nP_i^2>L^4 for i<ai<a. Independent disjoint trials give

Pr(In,i=0)(1Pi2)n/2,Pr(Jn,i=0)=enPi2.\Pr(I_{n,i}=0)\le(1-P_i^2)^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}, \qquad \Pr(J_{n,i}=0)=e^{-nP_i^2}.

Consequently both head subvectors equal the all-ones vector except with probability at most 2aeL4/32a e^{-L^4/3}.

For r<nr<n, iai\ge a, introduce the occurrence variables

Wr,i=1{Zr=Zr+1=i}.W_{r,i}=\mathbf1\{Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\}.

Give (r,i)(r,i) the dependency neighborhood consisting of all (s,j)(s,j) with sr1|s-r|\le1. Variables outside this neighborhood are independent. With

S=iaPi=Pa1q,S_\ell=\sum_{i\ge a}P_i^\ell=\frac{P_a^\ell}{1-q^\ell},

the two nonzero Chen--Stein dependency sums are exactly

b1=(3n5)S22,b2=2(n2)S3.b_1=(3n-5)S_2^2,\qquad b_2=2(n-2)S_3.

Indeed, overlapping occurrences of distinct letters are impossible, whereas overlapping occurrences of the same letter have probability Pi3P_i^3.

By the point-process Poisson approximation of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon, Theorem 2, the entire tail occurrence field couples to independent Poisson variables at total-variation cost at most 4(b1+b2)4(b_1+b_2). The countable version follows by finite truncation and monotone convergence. Summing over positions and applying the indicator map yields independent Poisson means (n1)Pi2(n-1)P_i^2. Independent Poisson increments change these to nPi2nP_i^2 at additional cost at most S2S_2. Therefore

dTV(L((In,i)i1),L((Jn,i)i1))12L8n(1q2)2+8L6n(1q3)+L4n(1q2)+2aeL4/3=Op((logn)6n).(*)\begin{aligned} d_{\rm TV}\left( \mathcal L((I_{n,i})_{i\ge1}), \mathcal L((J_{n,i})_{i\ge1}) \right) &\le \frac{12L^8}{n(1-q^2)^2} +\frac{8L^6}{\sqrt n(1-q^3)} +\frac{L^4}{n(1-q^2)} +2a e^{-L^4/3}\\ &=O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right). \end{aligned} \tag{*}

In particular, uniformly even over moving thresholds,

suptRPr(Xnt)Pr(ξnt)=Op((logn)6n).\sup_{t\in\mathbb R} \left|\Pr(X_n\le t)-\Pr(\xi_n\le t)\right| =O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right).

To obtain all absolute centered moments, fix k1k\ge1 and put

Mn=(k+4)logn2logq,Λn=ni>MnPi2=Op(nk3).M_n=\left\lceil\frac{(k+4)\log n}{2|\log q|}\right\rceil, \qquad \Lambda_n=n\sum_{i>M_n}P_i^2=O_p(n^{-k-3}).

For the genuine count, the probability that any omitted letter occurs as a repeated pair is at most Λn\Lambda_n, and Xnn1X_n\le n-1; thus deleting the tail changes its first kk raw moments by o(1)o(1). For the independent count the number of omitted Poisson occurrences is Pois(Λn)\operatorname{Pois}(\Lambda_n), independent of the first MnM_n coordinates, so the same conclusion follows from the Poisson moment formulas.

Both truncated counts lie in [0,Mn][0,M_n]. The maximal coupling in (*) gives moment errors bounded by

MnjdTV=Op,j((logn)j+6n),1jk.M_n^j\,d_{\rm TV} =O_{p,j}\left(\frac{(\log n)^{j+6}}{\sqrt n}\right), \qquad 1\le j\le k.

Their exact means therefore differ by o(1)o(1). Finally,

xukyvkk(x+y+u+v)k1(xy+uv)\big||x-u|^k-|y-v|^k\big| \le k(|x|+|y|+|u|+|v|)^{k-1}(|x-y|+|u-v|)

also handles odd absolute moments after coupling and restoring the negligible tails. Hence, for every fixed positive integer kk,

EXnEXnkEξnEξnk0.\mathbb E|X_n-\mathbb EX_n|^k - \mathbb E|\xi_n-\mathbb E\xi_n|^k \longrightarrow0.

Thus both Conjectures 3.1 and 3.4 of Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023) hold; their previously conditional cumulant and distribution formulas are consequently unconditional.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·