Limiting-distribution equivalence for identical-letter pair counts
Let be the number of distinct adjacent pairs of identical letters in a geometrically distributed word of length , and let be the sum of independent random variables with Poisson distributions. Limiting-distribution conjecture. For any ,
This is stated as a weaker alternative to the higher-moment conjecture. It proposes that the distribution functions of the dependent statistic and its independent Poisson approximation become asymptotically indistinguishable.
References
Primary source
Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).
Additional references
8 papers in this index state this conjecture (2001–2022). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2005.12349, arXiv:1912.12277, arXiv:1903.09615, arXiv:1806.08732, arXiv:1211.7206, arXiv:1206.4853, arXiv:math/0112196.
Progress summary
A reader-written argument claims a complete proof of the conjecture, but no independent verification has established it.
Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward formulated this as a weaker alternative to their higher-moment conjecture. Their paper gives only a conditional limiting-distribution theorem: the asserted limit follows if the conjecture holds.
Known results
- The variance difference tends to zero: (Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, 2022/2023).
- Exact first- and second-moment formulas and asymptotic mean estimates are known, but do not imply distributional equivalence.
- The limiting law for is derived conditionally on the conjecture.
Posted attempt
A complete proof is claimed using a Chen--Stein Poisson point-process coupling, allegedly yielding total-variation convergence and even convergence of all fixed centered absolute moments. The attempt has not been independently verified and therefore does not settle the conjecture.
Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has an unverified complete-proof claim, but no verified proof or counterexample; the mathematical question remains open.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Proof of the full limiting-distribution conjecture, uniformly over every threshold.
Fix , put , and let . For independent geometric letters , define
Independently let , , and .
Write , and choose the smallest with . Then , , and for . Independent disjoint trials give
Consequently both head subvectors equal the all-ones vector except with probability at most .
For , , introduce the occurrence variables
Give the dependency neighborhood consisting of all with . Variables outside this neighborhood are independent. With
the two nonzero Chen--Stein dependency sums are exactly
Indeed, overlapping occurrences of distinct letters are impossible, whereas overlapping occurrences of the same letter have probability .
By the point-process Poisson approximation of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon, Theorem 2, the entire tail occurrence field couples to independent Poisson variables at total-variation cost at most . The countable version follows by finite truncation and monotone convergence. Summing over positions and applying the indicator map yields independent Poisson means . Independent Poisson increments change these to at additional cost at most . Therefore
In particular, uniformly even over moving thresholds,
To obtain all absolute centered moments, fix and put
For the genuine count, the probability that any omitted letter occurs as a repeated pair is at most , and ; thus deleting the tail changes its first raw moments by . For the independent count the number of omitted Poisson occurrences is , independent of the first coordinates, so the same conclusion follows from the Poisson moment formulas.
Both truncated counts lie in . The maximal coupling in (*) gives moment errors bounded by
Their exact means therefore differ by . Finally,
also handles odd absolute moments after coupling and restoring the negligible tails. Hence, for every fixed positive integer ,
Thus both Conjectures 3.1 and 3.4 of Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023) hold; their previously conditional cumulant and distribution formulas are consequently unconditional.