Limiting-distribution equivalence for identical-letter pair counts

About 25 years old · traced to

Let X1(n)X^{(n)}_1 be the number of distinct adjacent pairs of identical letters in a geometrically distributed word of length nn, and let ξ(n)\xi^{(n)} be the sum of independent random variables ξi(n)\xi_i^{(n)} with Poisson(nPi2)(nP_i^2) distributions. Limiting-distribution conjecture. For any t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R},

lim⁡n→∞[P(X1(n)≤t)−P(ξ(n)≤t)]=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\left[\mathbb{P}(X^{(n)}_1\le t)-\mathbb{P}(\xi^{(n)}\le t)\right]=0.

This is stated as a weaker alternative to the higher-moment conjecture. It proposes that the distribution functions of the dependent statistic and its independent Poisson approximation become asymptotically indistinguishable.

References

Primary source

Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).

Additional references

8 papers in this index state this conjecture (2001–2022). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2005.12349, arXiv:1912.12277, arXiv:1903.09615, arXiv:1806.08732, arXiv:1211.7206, arXiv:1206.4853, arXiv:math/0112196.

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A reader-written argument claims a complete proof of the conjecture, but no independent verification has established it.

Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward formulated this as a weaker alternative to their higher-moment conjecture. Their paper gives only a conditional limiting-distribution theorem: the asserted limit follows if the conjecture holds.

Known results

  • The variance difference tends to zero: Var⁡(X1(n))−Var⁡(ξ(n))→0\operatorname{Var}(X^{(n)}_1)-\operatorname{Var}(\xi^{(n)})\to0 (Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, 2022/2023).
  • Exact first- and second-moment formulas and asymptotic mean estimates are known, but do not imply distributional equivalence.
  • The limiting law for X1(n)X^{(n)}_1 is derived conditionally on the conjecture.

Posted attempt

A complete proof is claimed using a Chen--Stein Poisson point-process coupling, allegedly yielding total-variation convergence and even convergence of all fixed centered absolute moments. The attempt has not been independently verified and therefore does not settle the conjecture.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has an unverified complete-proof claim, but no verified proof or counterexample; the mathematical question remains open.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Proof of the full limiting-distribution conjecture, uniformly over every threshold.

Fix 0<p<10<p<1, put q=1−pq=1-p, and let Pi=pqi−1P_i=pq^{i-1}. For independent geometric letters Z1,…,ZnZ_1,\ldots,Z_n, define

In,i=1{∃r<n:Zr=Zr+1=i},Xn=∑i≥1In,i.I_{n,i}=\mathbf 1\{\exists r<n: Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\},\qquad X_n=\sum_{i\ge1}I_{n,i}.

Independently let Yn,i∼Pois⁡(nPi2)Y_{n,i}\sim\operatorname{Pois}(nP_i^2), Jn,i=1{Yn,i>0}J_{n,i}=\mathbf1\{Y_{n,i}>0\}, and ξn=∑i≥1Jn,i\xi_n=\sum_{i\ge1}J_{n,i}.

Write L=log⁡nL=\log n, and choose the smallest a=ana=a_n with nPa2≤L4nP_a^2\le L^4. Then a=Op(L)a=O_p(L), q2L4<nPa2≤L4q^2L^4<nP_a^2\le L^4, and nPi2>L4nP_i^2>L^4 for i<ai<a. Independent disjoint trials give

Pr⁡(In,i=0)≤(1−Pi2)⌊n/2⌋,Pr⁡(Jn,i=0)=e−nPi2.\Pr(I_{n,i}=0)\le(1-P_i^2)^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}, \qquad \Pr(J_{n,i}=0)=e^{-nP_i^2}.

Consequently both head subvectors equal the all-ones vector except with probability at most 2ae−L4/32a e^{-L^4/3}.

For r<nr<n, i≥ai\ge a, introduce the occurrence variables

Wr,i=1{Zr=Zr+1=i}.W_{r,i}=\mathbf1\{Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\}.

Give (r,i)(r,i) the dependency neighborhood consisting of all (s,j)(s,j) with ∣s−r∣≤1|s-r|\le1. Variables outside this neighborhood are independent. With

Sℓ=∑i≥aPiℓ=Paℓ1−qℓ,S_\ell=\sum_{i\ge a}P_i^\ell=\frac{P_a^\ell}{1-q^\ell},

the two nonzero Chen--Stein dependency sums are exactly

b1=(3n−5)S22,b2=2(n−2)S3.b_1=(3n-5)S_2^2,\qquad b_2=2(n-2)S_3.

Indeed, overlapping occurrences of distinct letters are impossible, whereas overlapping occurrences of the same letter have probability Pi3P_i^3.

By the point-process Poisson approximation of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon, Theorem 2, the entire tail occurrence field couples to independent Poisson variables at total-variation cost at most 4(b1+b2)4(b_1+b_2). The countable version follows by finite truncation and monotone convergence. Summing over positions and applying the indicator map yields independent Poisson means (n−1)Pi2(n-1)P_i^2. Independent Poisson increments change these to nPi2nP_i^2 at additional cost at most S2S_2. Therefore

dTV(L((In,i)i≥1),L((Jn,i)i≥1))≤12L8n(1−q2)2+8L6n(1−q3)+L4n(1−q2)+2ae−L4/3=Op((log⁡n)6n).(*)\begin{aligned} d_{\rm TV}\left( \mathcal L((I_{n,i})_{i\ge1}), \mathcal L((J_{n,i})_{i\ge1}) \right) &\le \frac{12L^8}{n(1-q^2)^2} +\frac{8L^6}{\sqrt n(1-q^3)} +\frac{L^4}{n(1-q^2)} +2a e^{-L^4/3}\\ &=O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right). \end{aligned} \tag{*}

In particular, uniformly even over moving thresholds,

sup⁡t∈R∣Pr⁡(Xn≤t)−Pr⁡(ξn≤t)∣=Op((log⁡n)6n).\sup_{t\in\mathbb R} \left|\Pr(X_n\le t)-\Pr(\xi_n\le t)\right| =O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right).

To obtain all absolute centered moments, fix k≥1k\ge1 and put

Mn=⌈(k+4)log⁡n2∣log⁡q∣⌉,Λn=n∑i>MnPi2=Op(n−k−3).M_n=\left\lceil\frac{(k+4)\log n}{2|\log q|}\right\rceil, \qquad \Lambda_n=n\sum_{i>M_n}P_i^2=O_p(n^{-k-3}).

For the genuine count, the probability that any omitted letter occurs as a repeated pair is at most Λn\Lambda_n, and Xn≤n−1X_n\le n-1; thus deleting the tail changes its first kk raw moments by o(1)o(1). For the independent count the number of omitted Poisson occurrences is Pois⁡(Λn)\operatorname{Pois}(\Lambda_n), independent of the first MnM_n coordinates, so the same conclusion follows from the Poisson moment formulas.

Both truncated counts lie in [0,Mn][0,M_n]. The maximal coupling in (*) gives moment errors bounded by

Mnj dTV=Op,j((log⁡n)j+6n),1≤j≤k.M_n^j\,d_{\rm TV} =O_{p,j}\left(\frac{(\log n)^{j+6}}{\sqrt n}\right), \qquad 1\le j\le k.

Their exact means therefore differ by o(1)o(1). Finally,

∣∣x−u∣k−∣y−v∣k∣≤k(∣x∣+∣y∣+∣u∣+∣v∣)k−1(∣x−y∣+∣u−v∣)\big||x-u|^k-|y-v|^k\big| \le k(|x|+|y|+|u|+|v|)^{k-1}(|x-y|+|u-v|)

also handles odd absolute moments after coupling and restoring the negligible tails. Hence, for every fixed positive integer kk,

E∣Xn−EXn∣k−E∣ξn−Eξn∣k⟶0.\mathbb E|X_n-\mathbb EX_n|^k - \mathbb E|\xi_n-\mathbb E\xi_n|^k \longrightarrow0.

Thus both Conjectures 3.1 and 3.4 of Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023) hold; their previously conditional cumulant and distribution formulas are consequently unconditional.