Higher-moment equivalence for identical-letter pair counts

About 4 years old · traced to

Let X1(n)X^{(n)}_1 be the number of distinct adjacent pairs of identical letters in a geometrically distributed word of length nn, and let

ξ(n):=∑i≥1[ ⁣[ξi(n)≥1] ⁣]\xi^{(n)}:=\sum_{i\ge1}[\![\xi_i^{(n)}\ge1]\!]

where the independent random variables ξi(n)\xi_i^{(n)} have Poisson(nPi2)(nP_i^2) distributions. Higher-moment conjecture. For any k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N},

lim⁡n→∞(E∣X1(n)−EX1(n)∣k−E∣ξ(n)−Eξ(n)∣k)=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\mathbb E\left|X^{(n)}_1-\mathbb E X^{(n)}_1\right|^k-\mathbb E\left|\xi^{(n)}-\mathbb E\xi^{(n)}\right|^k\right)=0.

The conjecture extends the established asymptotic agreement of the variances and the corresponding one-point probabilities, suggesting that the dependent pair-count statistic has all centered absolute moments asymptotically governed by the independent Poisson model.

References

Primary source

Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A reader-posted argument claims a complete proof of the conjecture, but no independent verification has been found, so the result is not yet settled.

Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward formulated the conjecture in 2022: the centered absolute moments of the dependent pair count should asymptotically match those of an independent Poisson model for every kk. Their paper presents it as Conjecture 3.13.1, not as a theorem.

Known results

  • The variance difference tends to 00 (Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, 2022).
  • Corresponding one-point probability asymptotics are established (Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, 2022).
  • Expectation asymptotics and exact first- and second-moment formulas are known (Archibald, Blecher, Brennan, Knopfmacher, Wagner, and Ward, 2021).
  • The higher-moment conjecture would imply corresponding cumulant asymptotics.

Posted attempt

A reader-posted argument claims a complete proof via a total-variation coupling between the dependent occurrence field and independent Poisson counts, followed by truncation to transfer every fixed centered absolute moment. This attempt has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): variance and lower-order results are established, while a complete proof of the higher-moment conjecture has been claimed but remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Proof of the full higher-moment conjecture, with a stronger whole-field coupling.

Fix 0<p<10<p<1, put q=1−pq=1-p, and let Pi=pqi−1P_i=pq^{i-1}. For independent geometric letters Z1,…,ZnZ_1,\ldots,Z_n, define

In,i=1{∃r<n:Zr=Zr+1=i},Xn=∑i≥1In,i.I_{n,i}=\mathbf 1\{\exists r<n: Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\},\qquad X_n=\sum_{i\ge1}I_{n,i}.

Independently let Yn,i∼Pois⁡(nPi2)Y_{n,i}\sim\operatorname{Pois}(nP_i^2), Jn,i=1{Yn,i>0}J_{n,i}=\mathbf1\{Y_{n,i}>0\}, and ξn=∑i≥1Jn,i\xi_n=\sum_{i\ge1}J_{n,i}.

Write L=log⁡nL=\log n, and choose the smallest a=ana=a_n with nPa2≤L4nP_a^2\le L^4. Then a=Op(L)a=O_p(L), q2L4<nPa2≤L4q^2L^4<nP_a^2\le L^4, and nPi2>L4nP_i^2>L^4 for i<ai<a. Independent disjoint trials give

Pr⁡(In,i=0)≤(1−Pi2)⌊n/2⌋,Pr⁡(Jn,i=0)=e−nPi2.\Pr(I_{n,i}=0)\le(1-P_i^2)^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}, \qquad \Pr(J_{n,i}=0)=e^{-nP_i^2}.

Consequently both head subvectors equal the all-ones vector except with probability at most 2ae−L4/32a e^{-L^4/3}.

For r<nr<n, i≥ai\ge a, introduce the occurrence variables

Wr,i=1{Zr=Zr+1=i}.W_{r,i}=\mathbf1\{Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\}.

Give (r,i)(r,i) the dependency neighborhood consisting of all (s,j)(s,j) with ∣s−r∣≤1|s-r|\le1. Variables outside this neighborhood are independent. With

Sℓ=∑i≥aPiℓ=Paℓ1−qℓ,S_\ell=\sum_{i\ge a}P_i^\ell=\frac{P_a^\ell}{1-q^\ell},

the two nonzero Chen--Stein dependency sums are exactly

b1=(3n−5)S22,b2=2(n−2)S3.b_1=(3n-5)S_2^2,\qquad b_2=2(n-2)S_3.

Indeed, overlapping occurrences of distinct letters are impossible, whereas overlapping occurrences of the same letter have probability Pi3P_i^3.

By the point-process Poisson approximation of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon, Theorem 2, the entire tail occurrence field couples to independent Poisson variables at total-variation cost at most 4(b1+b2)4(b_1+b_2). The countable version follows by finite truncation and monotone convergence. Summing over positions and applying the indicator map yields independent Poisson means (n−1)Pi2(n-1)P_i^2. Independent Poisson increments change these to nPi2nP_i^2 at additional cost at most S2S_2. Therefore

dTV(L((In,i)i≥1),L((Jn,i)i≥1))≤12L8n(1−q2)2+8L6n(1−q3)+L4n(1−q2)+2ae−L4/3=Op((log⁡n)6n).(*)\begin{aligned} d_{\rm TV}\left( \mathcal L((I_{n,i})_{i\ge1}), \mathcal L((J_{n,i})_{i\ge1}) \right) &\le \frac{12L^8}{n(1-q^2)^2} +\frac{8L^6}{\sqrt n(1-q^3)} +\frac{L^4}{n(1-q^2)} +2a e^{-L^4/3}\\ &=O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right). \end{aligned} \tag{*}

In particular, uniformly even over moving thresholds,

sup⁡t∈R∣Pr⁡(Xn≤t)−Pr⁡(ξn≤t)∣=Op((log⁡n)6n).\sup_{t\in\mathbb R} \left|\Pr(X_n\le t)-\Pr(\xi_n\le t)\right| =O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right).

To obtain all absolute centered moments, fix k≥1k\ge1 and put

Mn=⌈(k+4)log⁡n2∣log⁡q∣⌉,Λn=n∑i>MnPi2=Op(n−k−3).M_n=\left\lceil\frac{(k+4)\log n}{2|\log q|}\right\rceil, \qquad \Lambda_n=n\sum_{i>M_n}P_i^2=O_p(n^{-k-3}).

For the genuine count, the probability that any omitted letter occurs as a repeated pair is at most Λn\Lambda_n, and Xn≤n−1X_n\le n-1; thus deleting the tail changes its first kk raw moments by o(1)o(1). For the independent count the number of omitted Poisson occurrences is Pois⁡(Λn)\operatorname{Pois}(\Lambda_n), independent of the first MnM_n coordinates, so the same conclusion follows from the Poisson moment formulas.

Both truncated counts lie in [0,Mn][0,M_n]. The maximal coupling in (*) gives moment errors bounded by

Mnj dTV=Op,j((log⁡n)j+6n),1≤j≤k.M_n^j\,d_{\rm TV} =O_{p,j}\left(\frac{(\log n)^{j+6}}{\sqrt n}\right), \qquad 1\le j\le k.

Their exact means therefore differ by o(1)o(1). Finally,

∣∣x−u∣k−∣y−v∣k∣≤k(∣x∣+∣y∣+∣u∣+∣v∣)k−1(∣x−y∣+∣u−v∣)\big||x-u|^k-|y-v|^k\big| \le k(|x|+|y|+|u|+|v|)^{k-1}(|x-y|+|u-v|)

also handles odd absolute moments after coupling and restoring the negligible tails. Hence, for every fixed positive integer kk,

E∣Xn−EXn∣k−E∣ξn−Eξn∣k⟶0.\mathbb E|X_n-\mathbb EX_n|^k - \mathbb E|\xi_n-\mathbb E\xi_n|^k \longrightarrow0.

Thus both Conjectures 3.1 and 3.4 of Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023) hold; their previously conditional cumulant and distribution formulas are consequently unconditional.