Higher-moment equivalence for identical-letter pair counts

From papers

Let X1(n)X^{(n)}_1 be the number of distinct adjacent pairs of identical letters in a geometrically distributed word of length nn, and let

ξ(n):=i1[ ⁣[ξi(n)1] ⁣]\xi^{(n)}:=\sum_{i\ge1}[\![\xi_i^{(n)}\ge1]\!]

where the independent random variables ξi(n)\xi_i^{(n)} have Poisson(nPi2)(nP_i^2) distributions. Higher-moment conjecture. For any kNk\in\mathbb{N},

limn(EX1(n)EX1(n)kEξ(n)Eξ(n)k)=0.\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\mathbb E\left|X^{(n)}_1-\mathbb E X^{(n)}_1\right|^k-\mathbb E\left|\xi^{(n)}-\mathbb E\xi^{(n)}\right|^k\right)=0.

The conjecture extends the established asymptotic agreement of the variances and the corresponding one-point probabilities, suggesting that the dependent pair-count statistic has all centered absolute moments asymptotically governed by the independent Poisson model.

Progress summary

Open

The conjecture remains unproved: only the variance and related simpler checks are known.

Louchard and collaborators formulated the statement as Conjecture 3.1 in 2022, asserting that the dependent count and an independent Poisson-based model have asymptotically identical centered absolute moments of every order. No source found here reports a proof, counterexample, or withdrawal.

Known results

  • Louchard et al. established asymptotic agreement of the variances.
  • The same variance analysis gives agreement of the relevant one-point probabilities.
  • Archibald, Blecher, Brennan, Knopfmacher, Wagner, and Ward obtained expectation asymptotics and exact first- and second-moment results for adjacent equal-letter pairs.
  • Louchard et al. showed that the conjecture would imply corresponding cumulant asymptotics.

2023 higher-moment discussion

A later source says that extending the covariance methods to higher moments was uncertain and reports no proof or counterexample, so the conjectural status remained unchanged.

Current status (as of August 2026): the variance and lower-order results are established, but the higher-moment conjecture remains open.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).

Solutions 1

Proof

Proof of the full higher-moment conjecture, with a stronger whole-field coupling.

Fix 0<p<10<p<1, put q=1pq=1-p, and let Pi=pqi1P_i=pq^{i-1}. For independent geometric letters Z1,,ZnZ_1,\ldots,Z_n, define

In,i=1{r<n:Zr=Zr+1=i},Xn=i1In,i.I_{n,i}=\mathbf 1\{\exists r<n: Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\},\qquad X_n=\sum_{i\ge1}I_{n,i}.

Independently let Yn,iPois(nPi2)Y_{n,i}\sim\operatorname{Pois}(nP_i^2), Jn,i=1{Yn,i>0}J_{n,i}=\mathbf1\{Y_{n,i}>0\}, and ξn=i1Jn,i\xi_n=\sum_{i\ge1}J_{n,i}.

Write L=lognL=\log n, and choose the smallest a=ana=a_n with nPa2L4nP_a^2\le L^4. Then a=Op(L)a=O_p(L), q2L4<nPa2L4q^2L^4<nP_a^2\le L^4, and nPi2>L4nP_i^2>L^4 for i<ai<a. Independent disjoint trials give

Pr(In,i=0)(1Pi2)n/2,Pr(Jn,i=0)=enPi2.\Pr(I_{n,i}=0)\le(1-P_i^2)^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}, \qquad \Pr(J_{n,i}=0)=e^{-nP_i^2}.

Consequently both head subvectors equal the all-ones vector except with probability at most 2aeL4/32a e^{-L^4/3}.

For r<nr<n, iai\ge a, introduce the occurrence variables

Wr,i=1{Zr=Zr+1=i}.W_{r,i}=\mathbf1\{Z_r=Z_{r+1}=i\}.

Give (r,i)(r,i) the dependency neighborhood consisting of all (s,j)(s,j) with sr1|s-r|\le1. Variables outside this neighborhood are independent. With

S=iaPi=Pa1q,S_\ell=\sum_{i\ge a}P_i^\ell=\frac{P_a^\ell}{1-q^\ell},

the two nonzero Chen--Stein dependency sums are exactly

b1=(3n5)S22,b2=2(n2)S3.b_1=(3n-5)S_2^2,\qquad b_2=2(n-2)S_3.

Indeed, overlapping occurrences of distinct letters are impossible, whereas overlapping occurrences of the same letter have probability Pi3P_i^3.

By the point-process Poisson approximation of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon, Theorem 2, the entire tail occurrence field couples to independent Poisson variables at total-variation cost at most 4(b1+b2)4(b_1+b_2). The countable version follows by finite truncation and monotone convergence. Summing over positions and applying the indicator map yields independent Poisson means (n1)Pi2(n-1)P_i^2. Independent Poisson increments change these to nPi2nP_i^2 at additional cost at most S2S_2. Therefore

dTV(L((In,i)i1),L((Jn,i)i1))12L8n(1q2)2+8L6n(1q3)+L4n(1q2)+2aeL4/3=Op((logn)6n).(*)\begin{aligned} d_{\rm TV}\left( \mathcal L((I_{n,i})_{i\ge1}), \mathcal L((J_{n,i})_{i\ge1}) \right) &\le \frac{12L^8}{n(1-q^2)^2} +\frac{8L^6}{\sqrt n(1-q^3)} +\frac{L^4}{n(1-q^2)} +2a e^{-L^4/3}\\ &=O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right). \end{aligned} \tag{*}

In particular, uniformly even over moving thresholds,

suptRPr(Xnt)Pr(ξnt)=Op((logn)6n).\sup_{t\in\mathbb R} \left|\Pr(X_n\le t)-\Pr(\xi_n\le t)\right| =O_p\left(\frac{(\log n)^6}{\sqrt n}\right).

To obtain all absolute centered moments, fix k1k\ge1 and put

Mn=(k+4)logn2logq,Λn=ni>MnPi2=Op(nk3).M_n=\left\lceil\frac{(k+4)\log n}{2|\log q|}\right\rceil, \qquad \Lambda_n=n\sum_{i>M_n}P_i^2=O_p(n^{-k-3}).

For the genuine count, the probability that any omitted letter occurs as a repeated pair is at most Λn\Lambda_n, and Xnn1X_n\le n-1; thus deleting the tail changes its first kk raw moments by o(1)o(1). For the independent count the number of omitted Poisson occurrences is Pois(Λn)\operatorname{Pois}(\Lambda_n), independent of the first MnM_n coordinates, so the same conclusion follows from the Poisson moment formulas.

Both truncated counts lie in [0,Mn][0,M_n]. The maximal coupling in (*) gives moment errors bounded by

MnjdTV=Op,j((logn)j+6n),1jk.M_n^j\,d_{\rm TV} =O_{p,j}\left(\frac{(\log n)^{j+6}}{\sqrt n}\right), \qquad 1\le j\le k.

Their exact means therefore differ by o(1)o(1). Finally,

xukyvkk(x+y+u+v)k1(xy+uv)\big||x-u|^k-|y-v|^k\big| \le k(|x|+|y|+|u|+|v|)^{k-1}(|x-y|+|u-v|)

also handles odd absolute moments after coupling and restoring the negligible tails. Hence, for every fixed positive integer kk,

EXnEXnkEξnEξnk0.\mathbb E|X_n-\mathbb EX_n|^k - \mathbb E|\xi_n-\mathbb E\xi_n|^k \longrightarrow0.

Thus both Conjectures 3.1 and 3.4 of Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023) hold; their previously conditional cumulant and distribution formulas are consequently unconditional.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·