Higher-moment equivalence for identical-letter pair counts
Higher-moment equivalence for identical-letter pair counts
Let be the number of distinct adjacent pairs of identical letters in a geometrically distributed word of length , and let
where the independent random variables have Poisson distributions. Higher-moment conjecture. For any ,
The conjecture extends the established asymptotic agreement of the variances and the corresponding one-point probabilities, suggesting that the dependent pair-count statistic has all centered absolute moments asymptotically governed by the independent Poisson model.
Progress summary
The conjecture remains unproved: only the variance and related simpler checks are known.
Louchard and collaborators formulated the statement as Conjecture 3.1 in 2022, asserting that the dependent count and an independent Poisson-based model have asymptotically identical centered absolute moments of every order. No source found here reports a proof, counterexample, or withdrawal.
Known results
- Louchard et al. established asymptotic agreement of the variances.
- The same variance analysis gives agreement of the relevant one-point probabilities.
- Archibald, Blecher, Brennan, Knopfmacher, Wagner, and Ward obtained expectation asymptotics and exact first- and second-moment results for adjacent equal-letter pairs.
- Louchard et al. showed that the conjecture would imply corresponding cumulant asymptotics.
2023 higher-moment discussion
A later source says that extending the covariance methods to higher moments was uncertain and reports no proof or counterexample, so the conjectural status remained unchanged.
Current status (as of August 2026): the variance and lower-order results are established, but the higher-moment conjecture remains open.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Guy Louchard, Werner Schachinger and Mark Daniel Ward, “The number of distinct adjacent pairs in geometrically distributed words: a probabilistic and combinatorial analysis”, arXiv:2203.14773 (2023).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Proof of the full higher-moment conjecture, with a stronger whole-field coupling.
Fix , put , and let . For independent geometric letters , define
Independently let , , and .
Write , and choose the smallest with . Then , , and for . Independent disjoint trials give
Consequently both head subvectors equal the all-ones vector except with probability at most .
For , , introduce the occurrence variables
Give the dependency neighborhood consisting of all with . Variables outside this neighborhood are independent. With
the two nonzero Chen--Stein dependency sums are exactly
Indeed, overlapping occurrences of distinct letters are impossible, whereas overlapping occurrences of the same letter have probability .
By the point-process Poisson approximation of Arratia, Goldstein, and Gordon, Theorem 2, the entire tail occurrence field couples to independent Poisson variables at total-variation cost at most . The countable version follows by finite truncation and monotone convergence. Summing over positions and applying the indicator map yields independent Poisson means . Independent Poisson increments change these to at additional cost at most . Therefore
In particular, uniformly even over moving thresholds,
To obtain all absolute centered moments, fix and put
For the genuine count, the probability that any omitted letter occurs as a repeated pair is at most , and ; thus deleting the tail changes its first raw moments by . For the independent count the number of omitted Poisson occurrences is , independent of the first coordinates, so the same conclusion follows from the Poisson moment formulas.
Both truncated counts lie in . The maximal coupling in (*) gives moment errors bounded by
Their exact means therefore differ by . Finally,
also handles odd absolute moments after coupling and restoring the negligible tails. Hence, for every fixed positive integer ,
Thus both Conjectures 3.1 and 3.4 of Louchard, Schachinger, and Ward, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 25 (2023) hold; their previously conditional cumulant and distribution formulas are consequently unconditional.