Disjunction conjecture for Deligne–Lusztig cohomology

At least 3 years old · documented by

Let WW be a Weyl group, let ϕ\phi be the Frobenius datum, and let w∈Ww\in W satisfy (λ(w)ϕ)m=πϕm(\lambda(w)\phi)^m=\pi\phi^m for some m≥1m\geq1. For i≠ji\neq j, consider the compactly supported cohomology representations Hci(X(w),Q‾ℓ)H_c^i(X(w),\overline{\mathbf Q}_\ell) and Hcj(X(w),Q‾ℓ)H_c^j(X(w),\overline{\mathbf Q}_\ell) of GG.

Disjunction conjecture for Deligne–Lusztig cohomology.

Hom⁡Q‾ℓG(Hci(X(w),Q‾ℓ),Hcj(X(w),Q‾ℓ))=0.\operatorname{Hom}_{\overline{\mathbf Q}_\ell G}\bigl(H_c^i(X(w),\overline{\mathbf Q}_\ell),H_c^j(X(w),\overline{\mathbf Q}_\ell)\bigr)=0.

This predicts that distinct cohomological degrees have no common direct representation-theoretic contribution. It is known for Coxeter elements, groups of rank 22, and in general for GL⁡n\operatorname{GL}_n, but remains open in general.

References

Primary source

Raphael Rouquier, “Modular representations of finite groups and Lie theory”, arXiv:2202.08451 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.