Liftability conjecture for non-split metacyclic actions on surfaces
Liftability conjecture for non-split metacyclic actions on surfaces
Let be a closed orientable surface of genus , and let a non-split metacyclic action mean an action of a finite metacyclic group on that is not split. A regular cyclic cover is a finite regular covering of surfaces whose deck transformation group is cyclic.
Liftability conjecture. Every non-split metacyclic action on lifts under a suitably chosen finite regular cyclic cover to a split metacyclic action.
The preceding proposition gives an explicit liftability criterion in terms of the associated data set, and the stated corollary shows that several families of dihedral-type metacyclic actions factor through split metacyclic actions. The conjecture asserts that an appropriate finite regular cyclic cover exists for every non-split metacyclic action.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Kashyap Rajeevsarathy and Apeksha Sanghi, “Metacyclic actions on surfaces”, arXiv:2201.09602 (2022).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.