Regulated extensions independence-of-ell conjecture for A-motives

Let FF be a finite extension of the fraction field of AA, let p\mathfrak p be a finite place of FF, and let M\underline M be an AA-motive over FpF_{\mathfrak p}. For a maximal ideal \ell of AA distinct from the maximal ideal below p\mathfrak p, let Extgood1,reg(\mathbbm1,M)\operatorname{Ext}^{1,\mathrm{reg}}_{\mathrm{good}}(\mathbbm{1},\underline M)_\ell denote the regulated extensions having good reduction in the \ell-adic realization.

Regulated independence-of-\ell conjecture. The inclusion

ExtOp1,reg(\mathbbm1,M)Extgood1,reg(\mathbbm1,M)\operatorname{Ext}^{1,\mathrm{reg}}_{\mathcal O_{\mathfrak p}}(\mathbbm{1},\underline M)\subseteq\operatorname{Ext}^{1,\mathrm{reg}}_{\mathrm{good}}(\mathbbm{1},\underline M)_\ell

is an equality. In particular, Extgood1,reg(\mathbbm1,N)\operatorname{Ext}^{1,\mathrm{reg}}_{\mathrm{good}}(\mathbbm{1},\underline N)_\ell does not depend on \ell.

This is stated as a strong expectation after the inclusion supplied by the source's main theorem; it is a local regulated analogue of the equality between integral and good-reduction extensions.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Quentin Gazda, “On the Integral Part of A-Motivic Cohomology”, arXiv:2201.09304 (2024).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.