Broué–Malle–Michel conjecture on Deligne–Lusztig cohomology

Let G\mathbf G be a reductive group over a finite field, let dd be a positive integer, and let (L,λ)Cusd(G)({\mathcal L},\lambda)\in {\mathcal{Cus}}^d({\mathcal G}) with L=(q,L,F){\mathcal L}=(q,\mathbf L,F). Introduce the Deligne–Lusztig varieties and cohomology modules associated with a parabolic subgroup P\mathbf P admitting L\mathbf L as a Levi complement, and let WG(L,λ)W_{\mathcal G}({\mathcal L},\lambda) be the associated complex reflection group.

Broué–Malle–Michel conjecture. There exists such a parabolic subgroup P\mathbf P for which the cohomology modules in distinct degrees have no common irreducible constituent, and for some parameter kL,λk_{{\mathcal L},\lambda},

End(RLPG(λ))HkL,λ(WG(L,λ),ζd1q).\operatorname{End}\bigl({\mathcal R}_{\mathbf L\subset\mathbf P}^{\mathbf G}(\lambda)\bigr)\simeq {\mathcal H}_{k_{{\mathcal L},\lambda}}\bigl(W_{\mathcal G}({\mathcal L},\lambda),\zeta_d^{-1}q\bigr).

This conjecture seeks a uniform Hecke-algebra explanation of dd-Harish–Chandra theory through the \ell-adic cohomology of Deligne–Lusztig varieties. The source states that it is true for d=1d=1 but far from proved in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Cédric Bonnafé, “Calogero-Moser spaces vs unipotent representations”, arXiv:2112.13684 (2022).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.