Conjectural period relations for symmetric-power liftings
Conjectural period relations for symmetric-power liftings
Let be the cohomological cuspidal automorphic representation under consideration, with central character , Whittaker vector , period , and symmetric-power liftings equipped with periods for odd and for even . Conjectural period relations. For every , there is a constant , unique up to and depending only on and , such that the stated Galois-equivariance relations hold: for ,
\sigma\left(\frac{p({\rm Sym}^{2r+1}\mathit\Pi},\pm)}{C_{2r+1,\infty}G(\omega_\mathit\Pi)^{2r(r+1)^2}p(\mathit\Pi,\pm)^{r+1}\lVert f_\mathit\Pi\rVert^{2r(r+1)(2r+1)/3}}\right)=\frac{p({\rm Sym}^{2r+1}{}^\sigma\!\mathit\Pi},\pm)}{C_{2r+1,\infty}G({}^\sigma\!\omega_\mathit\Pi)^{2r(r+1)^2}p({}^\sigma\!\mathit\Pi,\pm)^{r+1}\lVert f_{{}^\sigma\!\mathit\Pi}\rVert^{2r(r+1)(2r+1)/3}},and for ,
These relations are proposed as period analogues of Deligne's conjecture for critical standard -values of symmetric-power liftings; the source gives no resolution evidence, so the relations remain conjectural.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Shih-Yu Chen, “On Deligne's conjecture for symmetric fifth L-functions of modular forms”, arXiv:2112.12978 (2021).
Additional references
2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2020–2021). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2012.00625.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.