Gritsenko–Poor–Yuen theta block conjecture for paramodular forms

Let Θf\Theta_f be a theta block of qq-order one that is a holomorphic Jacobi form of integral weight kk and integral index NN for A1A_1. Let Grit(Θf)\operatorname{Grit}(\Theta_f) denote its Gritsenko lift, let T(2)T_{-}(2) be the relevant Hecke operator, and let Borch\operatorname{Borch} denote the Borcherds product lift. Gritsenko–Poor–Yuen's theta block conjecture. As a Siegel paramodular form of weight kk and level NN, the Gritsenko lift is a Borcherds product, more precisely

Grit(Θf)=Borch(ΘfT(2)Θf).\operatorname{Grit}(\Theta_f)=\operatorname{Borch}\left(-\frac{\Theta_f|T_{-}(2)}{\Theta_f}\right).

The claim characterizes paramodular forms that are simultaneously Gritsenko lifts and Borcherds products. The supplied status evidence says that when k4k\geq4 every theta block of qq-order one is holomorphic and belongs to the stated 8A18A_1 family or a quasi-pullback, so this conjecture is proved in that range.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Haowu Wang and Brandon Williams, “Modular forms with poles on hyperplane arrangements”, arXiv:2112.06524 (2021).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.