The three-prime floor-function set formula
The three-prime floor-function set formula
Let denote the number of primes in the set . Suppose that , where are primes satisfying . The three-prime floor-function set formula. Then
This statement is presented as a generalisation suggested by a limited computational investigation; unlike the preceding prime and semiprime cases, no proof or resolution is supplied in the source.
Progress summary
The proposed three-prime rule remains an unproved conjecture, with no public counterexample or verification found.
M. A. Heyman proposed the statement as Conjecture 4 in 2021, based on a limited Maple investigation. It predicts the change in when according to whether is larger or smaller than .
Known results
- For prime , (Adams–Watters attribution; proved by Heyman).
- For with odd primes , (Heyman).
Current status (as of August 2026): The three-prime formula remains open; no proof, counterexample, or independent verification is recorded in the retrieved sources.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Randell Heyman, “Primes in floor function sets”, arXiv:2111.00408 (2021).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
In fact, a stronger statement holds for every odd integer :
where counts the distinct primes in
For every integer , the number of indices for which is
Thus if and only if .
If and are both odd, then is even and cannot divide . Consequently
Therefore no odd prime disappears when passing from to , and a new odd prime must divide .
Write for such a prime divisor. Then
Hence appears for the first time precisely when
Since and are odd, this is equivalent to , or
Finally, for every , so the prime contributes no change when . This proves the general formula.
Now suppose
Neither nor can satisfy . The only possible new prime is , and
Equality is impossible because is prime. Therefore
which proves both asserted cases.